Really?! I have often seen him on MSNBC commenting and agree he is anti-Bush, but I have to say I am surprised to find how devious and deceitful he really and truly is, if he was the author of the original article.
It will be interesting if he is still called upon to commentate. Of course, I expect to see him next on Chris Matthews with Matthews nodding along with every ill-conceived "insight" offered.
Almost any time there is a story slamming the administration, you can bet that Milbank is on the by-line. He specializes in "unnamed sources" and ellipses, as we see here. He is a liar and as far as I am concerned, as long as the Post employs him they have zero credibility.