Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: wallcrawlr
Looks like they're going to be sippin' espresso and smokin' weed in the Emerald City, eh?
39 posted on
09/16/2003 10:46:05 PM PDT by
ppaul
To: wallcrawlr
Typical hypocrisy from the left...the smell of hypocrisy in their cities should be an EPA sanctioned hazard. It probably erodes their precious ozone.
And as this thread has shown, the left wing doesn't really care about "the children" when they are required to put THEIR money where their mouths are. More proof their tired old rhetoric is just that.
40 posted on
09/16/2003 10:51:30 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: wallcrawlr
I am amazed that a vote was even considered. Is this a new development?
Usually the legislatures just pass the tax and let the people howl.
42 posted on
09/16/2003 10:54:05 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: wallcrawlr
Sweet. I was so pissed about this initiative I barely noticed that my new polling place is in the Seattle Labor Temple.
Boy, was that place a friggin joke.
To: wallcrawlr
To: wallcrawlr
Note to the Libs: So much for principle, eh?
49 posted on
09/17/2003 5:19:44 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: wallcrawlr
Seattle has rejected placing a tax on black Espresso. This proves they are not racist. However, the children will suffer....
50 posted on
09/17/2003 5:21:23 AM PDT by
Drango
(McClintock is my first choice, but given the numbers I'm voting for Arnold.)
To: wallcrawlr
scary that 31% of the people voted yes.
Maybe they work at jamba juice.
To: wallcrawlr
I never understood how they could come up with a tax for espresso drinkers but not for other hot beverages. Why exempt regular coffee, tea, herbal tea and Chai??
56 posted on
09/17/2003 8:26:53 AM PDT by
tellw
To: wallcrawlr
Good news! Thanks for letting us know!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson