Posted on 09/16/2003 5:37:04 PM PDT by gubamyster
Posted on Tue, Sep. 16, 2003
By Katherine Corcoran Mercury News
For 25 years, every statewide office-holder in California from U.S. senator to insurance commissioner has been elected with punch-card ballots. But on Monday, a trio of federal judges said those ballots can't be trusted.
In the six counties still using punch cards -- central to the federal appeals court ruling -- local elections officials said they've had few problems with the ballots over the years, and that they are confident they could run a fair election using them three weeks from now.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
The punch card hardware is completely accurate. She cited a tie in the 2002 Otay Mesa Water District. The winner was decided by a coin-flip, and the loser requested a manual recount, which took a few days to complete. The result was still the same tie, indicating that the punchcard reading machines had made no errors.
For instance, let's say someone really didn't want to vote for President but really cared about some local election or proposition. He could simply skip the Presidential section, but then he always runs the risk that someone else might punch his ballot. If the voter wanted to be 100% sure that he would not influence the Presidential vote, since there is no "no" vote, he could simply invalidate his Presidential vote by voting for more than one candidate.
Same here! I don't see how people could misunderstand the clear voting directions, and the machine counters are very reliable, too. But, my county wasn't part of the ACLU lawsuit because either it isn't as large as those counties or it doesn't have as high a proportion of certain minorities as those counties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.