Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smile for the panda-cam, dear
UPI via InterestAlert.com ^ | September 16, 2003 | staff?

Posted on 09/16/2003 11:33:30 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife

Estranged Australian couples are giving one another the evil eye electronically with spy cameras hidden in toys, a newspaper reported Tuesday.

As an increasing number of couples split and have visitation rights with their children, a growing number are electronically monitoring those visits, the Melbourne Herald Sun said.

The teddy bear cams feature a pen-sized camera that peeks through the nose, eyes or a button, although not just bears are capable of snooping.

Victorian Detective Service general manager Mark Grover said the soft-toy spy cams are custom-made and cost up to $600.

Couples are also hiring private detectives to watch each other during custody visits.

Local investigators said women were driving the trend, but about 35 percent of clients were men.

Grover said grandparents paid for about 50 percent of the firm's custody surveillance work.

"Often they want you to follow a person the night before access starts to check if they've gone to the boozer or are using marijuana," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: custody; hiddencameras; privacy; spying; surveillance

1 posted on 09/16/2003 11:33:31 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
This disgusts me,whatever happened to trust?

George Orwell must be laughing in his grave!
2 posted on 09/16/2003 11:43:09 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Custody disputes are notorious for being vicious. But this level of distrust is disturbing.
3 posted on 09/16/2003 11:50:45 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I think it would be illegal to put it in someone else's house, at least in the US.

Using surveillance in your own house is old news.
4 posted on 09/16/2003 11:54:59 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
My ex wives (yes, 2 of them) were wonderful mothers to my children, no matter what other differences we had. I can not imagine having done this to either of them.

The children are all grown up now, but when decisions had to be made concerning them, we (ex's hubby, Ex, My wife, and I) got together and made decisions as ADULTS!!!
5 posted on 09/16/2003 11:55:46 AM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Taking the teddy bear to the stip club...

:)

Serously though, I would have majour problems with this unless it was sanctioned by the court and because of past problems.
6 posted on 09/16/2003 12:15:32 PM PDT by zx2dragon (I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
When one has no evidence against a tightly knit clan of abusers, such a toy might be the best thing going. As much as I hate "for the children" type jurisprudence, surveilling your own children might pass muster. A lawyer might tell you to let him worry about admissibility, if you turned up something pertinent.
7 posted on 09/16/2003 1:31:21 PM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

"That makes me a sad panda."

8 posted on 09/16/2003 1:35:11 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson