Skip to comments.
House Democrats say Bush should fire advisers who helped him set Iraq policy
Associated Press ^
| 09-16-03
Posted on 09/16/2003 9:18:20 AM PDT by Brian S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:43:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
09/16/2003 9:18:21 AM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
House Democrats say Bush should fire advisers who helped him set Iraq policy No, we the People, should fire all the House Democrats...
2
posted on
09/16/2003 9:19:04 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: Brian S
Note to House Dems: Please hold your breath while you wait.
3
posted on
09/16/2003 9:21:16 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: SunStar
Now there's a much better idea!
4
posted on
09/16/2003 9:21:41 AM PDT
by
Warren
To: Brian S
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday exhorted President Bush to fire advisers who helped him set U.S. policy in Iraq, saying miscalculations have cost American lives. Not as many lives as Clinton lost us by doing nothing.
Hell, if they care about lives, clean up liberal Democrat California. They have 6x more deaths per day than Iraq.
She needs to remove the facist planks from her own eyes before demanding Bush remove the sliver from his.
5
posted on
09/16/2003 9:22:11 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: mewzilla
Another note to House Dems:
Shut up and leave Foreign Policy to grown-ups.
6
posted on
09/16/2003 9:22:59 AM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Moving to Turkmenistan, where all the jobs are.)
To: Brian S
Why do I get the impression everything a House Democrat does is politically motivated?
Because it is.
7
posted on
09/16/2003 9:23:20 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(A conservative who conserves -- a true capitalist!)
To: Brian S
The California Democrat That explains it. She's a Davis supporter. That makes her an idiot.
Imagine a Davis supporter in charge of this country. We'd all be starving in the dark.
8
posted on
09/16/2003 9:24:47 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Brian S
fire advisers who helped him set U.S. policy in Iraq We've all seen this happen several times: there is a desired result, but rationally justifying it is not so easy.
The result is a pile of paper that looks impressive by weight, but within the pile there is no good rational argument for the action. It is a form of dishonesty to think that a good rational reason will mysteriously appear if enough facts are collected.
An example: the recall of the governor of California is a result desired by some. This path was chosen rather than impeachment.
Why? There are no rational arguments sufficient to justify impeachment, but there are aesthetic arguments sufficient to justify recall. Good enough for Tinseltown.
9
posted on
09/16/2003 9:28:02 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: concerned about politics
To say that democrats are shameful is nothing new. But it is so shameful in wartime to be saying that soldier's lives were lost due to "miscalculations." I would like to point out that if a responsible elected official really believed this stuff, their obligation would be to talk to the president about it, not issuea press release. What are the odds Pelosi believes this nonsense, or that White House advisors will be fired after the most succesful and humane military operation in history?
10
posted on
09/16/2003 9:29:53 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: Brian S; SunStar; mewzilla; Warren; MNLDS; newgeezer
I find this House Dem rhetoric to be acceptable political posturing. What does it do politically? It gives retreat cover to the media and prez candidates for their outrageous Bush attacks.
The following points are made:
1. fire advisers over post-war planning - normal political blather of opposition party
2. promise quick approval of the $87B - supine acceptance of Bush's foreign policy
3. questioning how the $62B was spent - establishing a ground where some other workaday political battles may take place
To: Williams
Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., a Vietnam combat veteran John Murtha (and John Kerry for that matter) throw the 'vietnam veteren' thing out like it means something today. I'm sure they were heros at the time, but it would seem that long exposure to democrat party ideas is corrosive to one's character.
12
posted on
09/16/2003 9:44:14 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: Brian S
Actually, we should fire the Democrats whose refusal to kill OBL when they had the chance caused 3000 to be murdered.
Ooops. Forgot. We did. In November 2000.
To: Brian S
Suggestion to House Dem 'Leaders' - Get A Life. Given the Congressional Benefit Plan, the taxpayers will provide you with one free of charge.
14
posted on
09/16/2003 9:56:11 AM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
(There are two certainties. Death and Texas.)
To: Brian S
45mins ago I heard ABC press whores say that the WMD report is due out soon, and according to her report there is NO SMOKING GUN!! God help us! If they don't find anything related to a threatening WMD, W is in deep doo-doo!! If you think the W bash party from the bastard RATS and their WHORES is out of control, you haven't seen nothing YET! Wait until the bastards across the ocean read the report, they'll be BITCHING AND MOANING along side with the ANTI-AMERICAN US press!! This report is going to be a MASSIVE NIGHTMARE! It ain't gonna be a pretty picture. :( Time to stock up on some wine and strong drink!!
To: Brian S
Americans say Democratic House members should resign and emigrate from the country, never to return.
To: RoseofTexas
OBTW, If my memory serves me right, the report said that they have been given a glimpse of the report! BIG MISTAKE! She didn't say if the the administration released a few pages of the report, but appearently they must have. I pray it a ploy by W! The reporter was having an orgasm over the NO SMOKING GUN detail!!
To: tbpiper
combat veteran It is such a shame. When was the last, first or any time you ever heard a WWII veteran utter this phrase.
To: Brian S
An interesting convergence going on here: Pelosi is basically talking about the dreaded "neo-cons," who happen also to be the targets of such noteworthy intellects as Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul.
I think it won't be long before the alliance becomes public....
19
posted on
09/16/2003 10:03:08 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Brian S
"House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday exhorted President Bush to fire advisers who helped him set U.S. policy in Iraq, saying miscalculations have cost American lives."
Hey a-hole, bone headed moves by your scumbag president led to 3,000 lives lost on 9/11. Go stuff it you b****!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson