Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Not Satisfied With Arafat Resolution
AP via The Las Vegas Sun ^ | September 16, 2003 | EDITH M. LEDERER

Posted on 09/16/2003 9:00:05 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife

The United States said Tuesday it is not satisfied with a revised draft resolution demanding that the United Nations ensure the safety of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, and a quick vote was unlikely.

Syria had intended to push for a vote after a daylong open Security Council meeting Monday on the Middle East, but was persuaded to amend it and delay the vote for a day.

But U.S. deputy ambassador James Cunningham told reporters Tuesday after seeing the new text that more consultations were needed.

"I don't think the revised text is any different from the previous text. Draw your own conclusions," he said. "I'm not sure it's going to come to a vote - or when it's going to come to a vote."

America's U.N. Ambassador John Negroponte said on Monday he would not support the resolution unless it contained a "robust condemnation of terrorism" and specifically mentioned groups like Hamas and the Al-Aqsa Brigades.

He didn't say a U.S. veto was imminent.

Representatives from more than 40 countries spoke in Monday's Security Council debate. It followed Israel's promise last week to "remove" Yasser Arafat, an announcement that drew criticism from around the world, including the United States.

The draft "demands that Israel, the occupying power, desist from any act of deportation and to cease any threat to the safety of the elected president of the Palestinian Authority."

The revised draft being circulated to council members added stronger language condemning Israel's targeted assassinations of militant leaders and Palestinian suicide bombings, "all of which caused enormous suffering and many innocent victims."

It called for a cessation of "all acts of terror."

Vice Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said killing Arafat was an option, but later Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom backtracked on Olmert's remark.

The Palestinians are urging the Security Council to demand that Israel ensure Arafat's safety and prevent his deportation. Key council members are pushing both parties to implement the peace plan backed by the United States, Russia, the United Nations and the European Union.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arafat; israel; negroponte; plo; resolution; seccouncil; un; us; vote

1 posted on 09/16/2003 9:00:05 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
"Israel's promise last week to "remove" Yasser Arafat, an announcement that drew criticism from around the world, including the United States."

Nobody else wants him either evidently.
2 posted on 09/16/2003 9:07:34 AM PDT by Lee Heggy (Jealousy-The theory that some other fellow has just as little taste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
The world forgets who started the tailspin two weeks ago. How about a resolution condemning Hamas?

The European socialist philosophy of siding with the "weak" is the result of 50 years of education poisoning by the intellectual elites in France and Germany.

When civilization begins to appease barbarians, you can be certain its decline is in progress.

3 posted on 09/16/2003 9:19:45 AM PDT by aristotleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
He needs to die. Israel knows that. The U.S. needs to quit pussyfooting around with Palestine and get tough with them. I'm fed up with all of them.
4 posted on 09/16/2003 9:22:24 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
This whole UN is nothing but a circle jerk. LET'S GET OUT OF THE UN NOW!!!
5 posted on 09/16/2003 10:27:39 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
I agree that the UN is terrible.

But, I have never found a good answer to the dilemma we will face if we leave the UN, and then lose our veto power on the Sec. Council. Would it be a good idea to have the Sec. Council voting against our favor?
6 posted on 09/16/2003 10:30:15 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
7 posted on 09/16/2003 10:42:40 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I can visualize it now UN troops with French participation enter Israel. The FRendh surrender to the first palestinian camel jackey that they meet and the entire UN disolves in disarray.
8 posted on 09/16/2003 12:09:22 PM PDT by lobo59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson