Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newgeezer
Awww, shoot. I got it backwards dang it. (Not enough blood in my caffine). My friend maintains that Bush has more confirmations than Clinton, or Bush I, or Reagan had at this point.

I find that hard to believe and thought I had seen articles showing the percentage breakdown to be pretty obvious as to Democrat obstruction tactics. Help me out if you can please.

3 posted on 09/16/2003 6:55:31 AM PDT by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: el_texicano
Clinton had 374 confirmed judges, only four less than Reagan, and the second-highest total ever, according to the Free Congress Foundation. Does that sound like a vacancy crisis to you?

To add a little more context, in three-plus terms, Roosevelt only had 197. Nixon's term-and-a-half only gave him time for 231 confirmed judges.

http://www.yale.edu/law/library/nom/nom_107/nom_chr.html
4 posted on 09/16/2003 7:30:36 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: el_texicano
The yale link tracks the Judicial Nominations.
5 posted on 09/16/2003 7:31:41 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson