To: Sandylapper
True. It didn't. But criminal law varies a lot less from state to state than civil law does. Where's iaf94 (wasn't that her name?) She's a CA lawyer. We need to ask her this question.
Hey, if there's any truth to this story of the plot (Skeeter, Dirty, Sneezy, Doc, Grumpy, Scott, etc.), then they're gonna charge him and the others with conspiracy. If they charge Scott with conspiracy, that means the statements of his co-conspirators will be admissible as NON-hearsay.
To: Devil_Anse
Well, maybe MG thinks he would have a real shot at discrediting a known criminal's testimony, vs. his client's, who had no previous criminal history. Hey, I'm just thinking outloud about what a criminal attorney might do to save his client's life, especially if the criminal attorney thought he really didn't have a snowball's chance in h#ll.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson