If a white person was walking down the sidewalk, a black person had to get off the sidewalk so the white person could walk by. There were laws which prohibited Blacks to look at white people in the eye, and a black person could be sent to jail for "assault (reckless eyeballing)." ... Blacks who dared to challenge the rules were lynched by the thousands. Men and women were lynched. Lynchings were public events and white men, women and children went to watch Blacks being tortured and burned or hanged... Whites literally got away with murder for killing "uppity" Blacks. Historical Backdrop to FREEDOM SONG "When 'Queen Hillary' walks down the hall, you're not supposed to look at her. You're actually supposed to go into an office if there is one nearby. She doesn't want staff 'seeing' her. And I know she sure as hell doesn't want to meet you or any other staffer!" "You have to be kidding me!" John replied. "No, we got the word at a staff meeting. It's true. Look around. Do you see anyone else in the hall?" John looked around and sure enough people were starting to emerge, like prarie dogs peeking out of their burrows after a hawk had flown past. Gary Aldrich, "Unlimited Access" "I'm doing my chores for Hillary Clinton." RON BROWN (ON HIS COMMERCE-DEPT CRIMES) TO NOLANDA HILL "I will not go down alone." RON BROWN (DAYS BEFORE HIS DEATH, ON HIS PLEA AGREEMENT WITH THE DOJ) TO BILL CLINTON
"It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important." Ironically, the logic of this pronouncement by Martin Luther King would, in short order, be refuted by his own lynching. King's hope was misplaced and his reasoning was circular. The resultant rule of law relied on by King presumed an adherence to the rule of law in the first instance. Adherence to the rule of law is not something normally associated with the clintons. Moreover, racial and ethnic disrespect, intimidation, exploitation and hate have always been a fundamental clinton tactic and the reflexive use the "N"-word and other racial and ethnic slurs, an essential element in the clinton lexicon. When the "first black president" and his wife ran Arkansas, the NAACP sued them for intimidating black voters at the polls. But it is the clintons' refinement of the DNC drag and drop that is, arguably, the most insidious and repugnant application of their special brand of race-hate politics. Drag and drop is a vote fraud technique by which unwitting, unwilling and/or illegal voters -- typically inner-city blacks and other minorities -- are literally dragged into the voting booth and told where to mark the "x" -- often multiple times per election. Drag and drop does not merely undermine and corrupt our system of government. Drag and drop is not merely illegal and exploitive. Drag and drop is racist and dehumanizing. Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a white man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing. In the senate race against Rick Lazio, it is widely understood that the drag and drop, (followed by the OLD ANGLE / NEW SQUARE / OVAL OFFICE SCHEME ) was clinton's vote fraud technique of choice used to overcome her low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures. "UPPITY" BLACKS AND THE CLINTONS The Ron Brown death and the clinton legacy of lynching represent the pernicious endpoint, but the history of clinton race-hate politics is replete with a reflexive 'disposal' of 'uppity' blacks from to Marian Wright Edelman to Lani Guanier to Jocelyn Elders to Carl McCall... To former Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson. The clintons' anointment of their man, Terry McAuliffe, to the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee didn't merely force Maynard Jackson to the back of the bus. It pushed him off. Two Degrees of Segregation: Al Sharpton, Donna Brazile, Carol Moseley-Braun and the clintons The announcement that intellectual and ethical lightweight, Carol Moseley-Braun intends to run for president raises the same fundamental question that hillary clinton's looming presence does: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?" In order to better understand the easy entry of Moseley-Braun into democrat field, clinton-clinton precedent and the field's increasingly circus-like quality notwithstanding, one must consider the precipitating acts of Al Sharpton and Donna Brazile. The perceived effrontery of Al Sharpton to enter the democrat field was answered by a pre-emptive Tawana Brawley attack by the leftist media. Sharpton's response was swift and sure. He warned the media that the next time they asked him about Tawana Brawley, he would invoke the clinton scandals and the media's apparent lack of interest in same when questioning hillary clinton. Surely the clintons' rapes-in-fact and other predations would trump this quaint little hoax... Sharpton's Harlem office burned down to the ground the next day--an accident "they" say--but he was not deterred. The media, however, apparently were; they quickly buried Tawana Brawley beside Juanita Broaddrick, somewhere in that dark recess of expediency called access journalism. If the clintons wanted Sharpton out because of the sheer embarrassment of him before the Sharpton salvo, they now would be satisfied with no less than Sharpton's head. Donna Brazile was to neutralize Sharpton by creating black favorite son candidates in every state of the union. It seems that Brazile ultimately thought the better of it, announcing that democrats should encourage and respect Sharpton, that Sharpton will bring black voters into the democrat party, much in the way the Jesse Jackson candidacy did. So how then to siphon off the black votes that will go to Sharpton? Enter clinton lackey, Carol Moseley-Braun, nothing more than a cynical extension of clinton drag and drop and legacy of lynching.
an Extension of clinton drag and drop and legacy of lynching
10 out of 10. You hit every nail on the head. I recognize that smell anywhere-the Clintons
Its argument seems to turn not on the equipment per se, but on minority error when using the equipment. (I suspect that a controlled study on this voter error would indict the minority voters, not any specific equipment.)
I know that I am just a stupid servant-citizen, but it seems to me that this is smoke and mirrors to delay the recall (and delay and delay).
I think on the 25th page of the black robes decision they site the argument based on a study by on rot gut berkeley prof that interviewed a few minorities who could not recall how they voted, thereby, concluding minorities and low income voters are too stupid to vote.
Great, overturn the voting rights of millions for a few idiots.
Next, I can see giving minorities left-wingers only, 20 voting points, just like Michigan State AA Program.
The long greasy criminal fingerprints of impeached Clinton reach from New York to California. He must own California for his dear scheming stalinist wife. He owns the bastard Davis and he will soon own us if we don't put a stop to left-wing black robed tyranny crushing our voting rights.