To: Timesink
I'm still confused. Does the "War Slut" mean to try to tell us that they could have been more anti-American in their war reporting, but chose not to out of fear?
7 posted on
09/16/2003 1:07:46 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
When pressed about what was withheld..she said it was the "TONE" that was stifled!We know that tone,don't we?
13 posted on
09/16/2003 1:12:48 AM PDT by
MEG33
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I'm still confused. Does the "War Slut" mean to try to tell us that they could have been more anti-American in their war reporting, but chose not to out of fear?You are not confused at all. You have it exactly correct.
Used to be, CNN was a 24-hour cable news monopoly and they could go as far left and anti-American as they pleased without worry that somebody would report the truth. That is no longer the case. It is now Amanpour and her fellow travellers who are confused. They don't know what to do and so they blubber.
Regards,
LH
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
How much more anti-American could CNN go? They covered for Saddam and his rape rooms, torture chambers and industrial people shredders.
If blocking the world from knowing what Saddam was really doing to his own people, while partying on his dime wasn't enough, what was?
CNN expressed more contempt for Bush than for Saddam. If that's "holding back", I wonder what it would have been like if they had felt free to be what they really wanted to be. Sick.
I'm still confused. Does the "War Slut" mean to try to tell us that they could have been more anti-American in their war reporting, but chose not to out of fear?
71 posted on
09/16/2003 6:17:59 PM PDT by
GOPJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson