Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
"I do not share your optimism that the Supreme Court will intervene in this case."

Didn't they refuse to step into the New Jersey Senatorial ballot issue (Lautenberg/Torricelli)? This was a clear violation of state law as well.

13 posted on 09/15/2003 2:13:51 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th
Didn't they refuse to step into the New Jersey Senatorial ballot issue (Lautenberg/Torricelli)? This was a clear violation of state law as well.

Different issue. In NJ, a state court violated its own laws, whereas in this case a federal court is violating state laws. (And in Florida 2000, a state court was violating laws involving a federal election).

14 posted on 09/15/2003 2:16:14 PM PDT by ambrose (The Rats Have Done It Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson