Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
As Rush L. just pointed out the SCOTUS last avoided state election issues as they came up in the Torricelli race.
201 posted on 09/15/2003 10:56:21 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: flamefront
"As Rush L. just pointed out the SCOTUS last avoided state election issues as they came up in the Torricelli race. "

Yeah, but that was a NJ Supreme Court ... here it's a federal court doing the dirty deed. Wholly Federal issues, cannot be ducked.
316 posted on 09/15/2003 11:11:23 AM PDT by WOSG (Dont put Cali on CRUZ CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: flamefront
That ruling was in the context of a ruling by the New Jersey State Supreme Court, not a ruling by a Federal court.

The opinion is written from the context of the Federal Constitution trumphing the California State Constitution.

321 posted on 09/15/2003 11:12:26 AM PDT by tx_eggman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: flamefront
As Rush L. just pointed out the SCOTUS last avoided state election issues as they came up in the Torricelli race.

The more I hear out of Rush's mouth, the more convinced I am becoming that he is an idiot.

757 posted on 09/15/2003 6:23:07 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (... you'd look like the Venus de Milo, if I just cut off your arms...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson