Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC- Recall election to be delayed
Pete Williams MSNBC ^ | Pete Williams

Posted on 09/15/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT by Ragirl

California Appeals Court - Recall should be blocked!!!

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2003election; 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; circus; circustent; davisrecalleelection; democrap; dirtytricks; election2003; floriduhagain; graydavis; impeachthe9th; outofcontrol; recall; thefixisin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 801-811 next last
To: Argus
And they welcome him with open arms.....I guess they must think alike....
241 posted on 09/15/2003 11:01:07 AM PDT by TheBattman (Did I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And the ACLU signed an agreement with the state of California that DOES NOT require the punch card system to be replaced until the 2004 Presidential Election.

Of course, when the 'rats are losing, they will use any means possible to try to snatch victory from defeat.

How many judges on the 9th Circuit are Clinton appointees?

How many Fedral judges have been appointed by President Bush AND BEEN APPROVED by the US Senate?

242 posted on 09/15/2003 11:01:19 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Registrations
243 posted on 09/15/2003 11:01:27 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I'm not a lawyer and, therefore, might have a flawed understanding of the matter. But as I understand the details of what the SCOTUS decided in its rulings in the 2000 Florida case, to remain consistent with those rulings, it will have to overturn the 9th Circuit on this.
244 posted on 09/15/2003 11:01:36 AM PDT by Wolfstar (NO SECURITY = NO ECONOMY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
'fraid I'm not
245 posted on 09/15/2003 11:01:46 AM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
You BRILLIANTLY nailed their style!
246 posted on 09/15/2003 11:02:14 AM PDT by justshe ("Do you trust a Democrat to protect America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

247 posted on 09/15/2003 11:02:39 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
In March: a vote for recall=2/3 rebate of your car tax, works for me.
248 posted on 09/15/2003 11:02:46 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Por La Raza Mierda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
after January 1 the illegals will vote...aarg!

Not if we can get 375.000 verified signatures for a referendum overturning SB60 before December 4th.


249 posted on 09/15/2003 11:02:54 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Arnold opposes the driver's licenses, but he also wants to lobby DC to legalize Illegal Aliens. Ah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Judiocracy - you're right - that's what we're becoming.

A country run by liberal judges.
250 posted on 09/15/2003 11:02:58 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: grayout
I live in "wealthy" North Orange County, I have used punch card ballots my entire life, I've NEVER heard of anyone complaining or being "disenfranchised".

The only voting irregularities in Orange County was when nearly 1000 illegals voted for Loretta Sanchez.
251 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:14 AM PDT by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
Can I get my $3,500 back?

Signed,
Larry Flint
252 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:15 AM PDT by Veggie Todd (Were those magic grits?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
All 3 on the panel that made this ruling were Democrat appointees.....FWIW
253 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:18 AM PDT by TheBattman (Did I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
"I would love to agree with you, but I am highly skeptical that most voters would have a clue of who appointed these ridiculous, misguided judges. "

Then we must tell the people ... these same judges were the ones saying "under God" needed to be taken out of the pledge. now they usurp Democracy, again and again. (not just this but also prop 187).

It's an abomination.

We must inform voters that the Democrats are supporting left-wing crazies on the bench and opposing highly quialified moderates, like Miguel Estrada.
254 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:19 AM PDT by WOSG (Dont put Cali on CRUZ CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
Another question:

How does a Federal Court have jurisdiction over a state election for a state office?
255 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:21 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
BTW, the "election law expert" on Fox News as I type this is saying that it is "unlikely that the Supreme Court will TAKE this case."

He's probably comparing this to the New Jersey case where the Supreme Court did not take that case. Does that make it harder for them to now take up a California election case when it refused to take up a New Jersey election case? How about the fact that the NJ case was a state-wide election for a federal position while this is a state-wide election for a state position?

-PJ

256 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:22 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Soon there will be a ruling that decrees that every MORON must be accompanied into the booth by a government "helper"

That already happens.

257 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:43 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
I've got to catch up on these posts, but all I could think was how interesting it is that the same punch cards good enough to elect Davis in a close election over Simon are not good enough for his recall?
258 posted on 09/15/2003 11:03:45 AM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
The Dead Kennedys were prophets. I'm convinced. Those lyrics are astounding.
259 posted on 09/15/2003 11:04:03 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Is this serious about illegals being allowed to vote?
HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

I know CA is screwed up but it can't be this bad!
260 posted on 09/15/2003 11:04:04 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson