[Mia T]

 

Q ERTY6 ^{utter failure}_BUMP

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent

Mia T, 5.5.03

 

hyperlinked images of shame
copyright Mia T 2003.

by Mia T, 4.6.03

 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

 

Mia T, THE ALIENS

 

Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."

Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.

From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.

That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.

When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)

Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.

With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.

With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.

The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

Q ERTY8
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update^BUMP!

[Mia T]

Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office? _PING

[carlo3b]

For the clintons, the California recall election is no less than a proxy for their war with the Kennedys for the control of the Democrat Party.

BINGO, and I don't believe the Devil Duo, can let the recall pass. Somewhere in a basement the drones are printing and poking NO RECALL ballots and mailing them in as quickly as their fast dirty hands can produce them!

[Brian Allen]

<< f Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked cli'tonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time. >>

I like that "Solipsist" label.

So portable.

So one-size-fits-all.

Fits McJeffords's-Bustamente's "principled-conservative" losers every-bit-as-comfortably as it fits Bustamente-Bustamente's.

And as it fit the "principled" Perot-nistas who saw to it Peking's "man" in Washington and the loathsome and fearsome Cli'ton Gang were so squalidly ensconced within -- and bemanuring -- our once white house, those long and awful years.

Make Joe Stalin's day, oh Useful Idiots.

Buy your own rope!

Vote for McJeffords and "elect" Mexico City's "man" in Sacreemeento.

[Helms]

Keep up the great work

[DoctorZIn]

Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

[Mia T]

It sounds as though the ACLU is arguing for affirmative action for minority voters.

Its argument seems to turn not on the equipment per se, but on minority error when using the equipment.
(I suspect that a controlled study of this voter error would indict the minority voters, not any specific equipment.)

The ACLU aimed at the wrong target.
If it actually wanted to reduce error in minority districts,
it would fight the Democrat Party's despicable practice of drag and drop...

EPILOGUE: THE 9^TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)

by Mia T, 9.14.03

Hamilton (or Madison) discussed the importance of wisdom and virtue in Federalist 57. "The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust."

(Contrast this with clinton, who recklessly, reflexively and feloniously subordinates the common good to his personal appetites.)

Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS

ill clinton's essential solipsism prevents him from seeing the obvious: The clinton paradigm applicable to the California recall election is not, as the rapist demagogues, the danger of an "unconstitutional," "right-wing cabal" ouster of a despised head of state. Rather, it is the danger of not ousting a self-serving, inept defective who cavalierly trades America's national securiity for his own political viability.

Just as the clintons endangered America in order to retain power, Gray Davis is about to go against his own better judgment and give illegal aliens--including the terrorist subset-- a de facto ID-- a California driver's license.

This pernicious scheme is not only about leftist racebaiting of the increasingly significant Latino vote. It is about getting the illegal-alien vote of every stripe and recalls the best efforts of clinton vote fraud in the Golden State..

Clinton letter in English. Click for full size.

Clinton letter in Spanish. Click for full size.

 

Davis would be wise to exercise some caution here. The impeached ex-ersatz president is hardly supporting him. ("This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis.") For the clintons, the California recall election is no less than a proxy for their war with the Kennedys for the control of the Democrat Party.

EPILOGUE: THE 9^TH CIRCUIT RULING

It is noteworthy that merely one day after the impeached ex-ersatz prez unblushingly trampled the venue (and the Constitution and Black self-determination), his -- (and, to be fair, Carter's) -- leftist political-hack judges on the infamously 180º-off-constitutional-course 9th Circuit made their ruling to postpone the recall, likely until the California DEMOCRAT presidential primary, a move that obviously skews the turnout to the left.

Because of the synchronicity, because of the brazenness, because of the balkanizing, because the ruling is an attempt to disenfranchise the right, because the ruling increases Davis' chances to prevail (and, therefore, clinton's apparent electoral effectualness), because, if Davis prevails, the clintons are strengthened and the Kennedys are weakened, because California control is necessary for clinton redux, and because this ruling at once sticks it to Bush, (his Bush v. Gore argument provides the equal-protection precedent), and stymies the Supremes, (would they really have the political courage to revisit this?), direct clinton involvement in this decision to cannot be ruled out.