To: South40
Want a gentleman's bet partner?
Why won't your boy sign a no tax hike pledge? Go back and read my article dude. YOU REFUSE TO LEARN FROM HISTORY, DON'T YOU. Pete Wilson played the same game in '90 -- tarred Feinstein as a tax hiker, refused to sign the no tax hike pledge himself, and then gave California a $7.3 billion tax hike. So you have trouble seeing the parallels? Man alive, you all deserve RINOS..
What do you know about California? Apparently very little. It takes a 2/3 vote of the State Legislature for a tax hike -- and SORRY PARTNER, BUT THE DEMS DON'T HAVE THE VOTES. So, Bustamante's tax hike is DOA. Now is there a measure to change that, but I see it dying in furious flames.
24 posted on
09/14/2003 1:48:29 PM PDT by
sruleoflaw
((FOR TOM MCCLINTOCK: Arnold will get my vote when hell freezes over and pigs fly))
To: sruleoflaw
"Dude"?
Sorry "Dude"...but I don't see the logic in your argument. Your claims that AS will "Raise taxes and ruin the state of the economy" is pure speculation. And it is based on what...because Wilson did it? How can I argue with that? I could suggest that 1) AS is not Pete Wilson, or 2) he's not about to make the same mistakes Wilson made, or 3) your argument is based solely on speculation and a deep-seated dislike for the man because of his liberal social positions. All of which are equally as possible, if not more so, than your speculative beliefs.
27 posted on
09/14/2003 1:56:16 PM PDT by
South40
(Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson