Skip to comments.
Neo-cons have hijacked US foreign policy
Boston Globe
| 9/10/2003
| Robert Kuttner,
Posted on 09/14/2003 12:26:20 PM PDT by ex-snook
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: ex-snook
"Neo-cons have hijacked US foreign policy"
Translation: ROBERT KUTTNER believes,
"IT'S ALL THE JOOSE FAULT"
To: Verginius Rufus
ROTFLMAO
You know ... I hadn't thought of that. Kinda puts his "judgement" in the proper perspective.
42
posted on
09/14/2003 2:08:08 PM PDT
by
OkiMusashi
(Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
To: Jmouse007
Translation: ROBERT KUTTNER believes, "IT'S ALL THE JOOSE FAULT"Robert Kuttner is himself jewish, I doubt that he believes that it's "all the Jews fault".
43
posted on
09/14/2003 2:17:24 PM PDT
by
zacyak
To: quidnunc
How many more 9/11s are you willing to have the US absorb? You might find it callous but a strong big nation should be able to absorb occasional terrorist attack without giving up its freedoms or being drawn into expensive and unfocused foreign adventures. I do not think that we need Patriot act I and II or war in Iraq. I shudder to think what will follow another WTC like event.
To put things in perspective, every years 500 000 of Americans die out of cancer. Such death often is much worse than from the bomb. A fraction of $87 billions spent on cancer research would do more good.
44
posted on
09/14/2003 2:21:01 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: Theyknow
You seem to say that our "neocon" policy is essentially about gaining power and "might makes right". This is a vile slander. We are using our power to do good and restrain evil in the world. Whatever it is, it is not "might makes right". Saddam Hussein is the mass murdering bully, not George Bush.
To: zacyak
Seems like no one wants to jump up and claim credit for this 'great victory' for world dominance.
46
posted on
09/14/2003 2:23:50 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Americans needs PROTECTIONISM - military and economic.)
To: Verginius Rufus
Rubin evidently thinks Chirac was acting in good faith, rather than to protect France's $50 billion worth of contracts with the Saddam regime, and to do whatever he could to undercut the American role in world affairs. It would be better to give Iraq with this $50 billion to the French and not to have to spend $87 billion every few months. Let them have it.
47
posted on
09/14/2003 2:24:28 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: Jmouse007
Translation: ROBERT KUTTNER believes,
"IT'S ALL THE JOOSE FAULT" Rober Kuttner is a "JOO"! And he sees himself as such quite strongly.
48
posted on
09/14/2003 2:28:48 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
A. Pole wrote:
You might find it callous but a strong big nation should be able to absorb occasional terrorist attack without giving up its freedoms or being drawn into expensive and unfocused foreign adventures. I do not think that we need Patriot act I and II or war in Iraq. I shudder to think what will follow another WTC like event. To put things in perspective, every years 500 000 of Americans die out of cancer. Such death often is much worse than from the bomb. A fraction of $87 billions spent on cancer research would do more good.This has to be one of the most empty-headed things ever uttered here on Free Republic.
You sir or madam (as the case may be) are a complete and utter lackwit.
49
posted on
09/14/2003 2:34:05 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: zacyak
Are you denying that the term "neocon" has become practically synonymous with "the Jews"? Or that the name "Wolfowitz" is commonly used as a euphemsim by anti-Semites when they want to disguise their anti-Semitism?
There are plenty of leftist Jews who believe that Jews who express conservative views are "Nazis", just as there are many leftist blacks who label conservative blacks as "uncle Toms".
It's clear that Kuttner and Rubin are knowingly doing exactly the same thing.
To: OkiMusashi
"Nobody has really ever seen one. They exist in theory only. However, when the day comes that we occupy Iran, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and North Korea it'll be safe to call the President and the Administration "Neo-Cons" ..... because everybody else will. "
Your ignorance on this issue is showing. Please research before you make such foolish statements. Those who believe in the Doctrine of Preemption are a well-published lot and there names are known to the well read. Learn something about the issue then ridicule, not the other way around.
51
posted on
09/14/2003 2:34:34 PM PDT
by
Theyknow
To: A. Pole
A. Pole wrote:
Rober Kuttner is a "JOO"! And he sees himself as such quite strongly.Noam Chomsky is a Jew too, so what's your point?
52
posted on
09/14/2003 2:36:24 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: Unam Sanctam
You seem to say that our "neocon" policy is essentially about gaining power and "might makes right". This is a vile slander. We are using our power to do good and restrain evil in the world. The key neocons are misguided cult like devotees of Strauss similar to the followers of Ayn Rand.
Strauss was so traumatised by the failure of Weimar Republic that he developed an idea that American Republic will collapse unless discreetly guided by the elite of the "super-clever" university intellectuals and armchair warriors.
53
posted on
09/14/2003 2:36:29 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: quidnunc
Noam Chomsky is a Jew too, so what's your point? My point is that when Chomsky or Kuttner criticize neocons they do not do it because some neocons might be Jews. Red Herring - does it ring a bell?
54
posted on
09/14/2003 2:39:57 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: ex-snook
If NeoCons have hijacked foreign policy...why are we demanding a terrorist state inside Israel, and why are we going to disgracefully abstain on the Security Council vote regarding Arafat? I am so sick of this self-hating Jew Kuttner.
To: Theyknow
reality check kojack.
I'm talking about the TERM being hijacked by the left and being applied in a sinister fashion.
I'm not debating "it" - as I happen to be an early adopter.
If anything is/was "neo" - it was the Clintonistas selling of American national interests to internaitonalist concerns (Clinton was (and Hillary is) willing to sacrifice American soverignty for Kyoto, the wot WCC, and the WTO).
Maybe you can get a clue by reading a book by Henry Kissinger "Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy" published in the mid-1950s. It's straight Wolfowitz - and good reading to boot.
56
posted on
09/14/2003 2:43:30 PM PDT
by
PokeyJoe
(Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
To: A. Pole
The Strauss thing is a ridiculous stretch and has been discounted.
57
posted on
09/14/2003 2:44:13 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: ex-snook
Amen.
58
posted on
09/14/2003 2:45:43 PM PDT
by
lodwick
To: The Electrician
Are you denying that the term "neocon" has become practically synonymous with "the Jews"?I've always understood the term to mean "Reagan democrats" who abandoned the party due to Jimmy Carter's idiocy and moved over to the Republicans. There may be some prominent Jews within the bunch, but the majority of them are not. Pundits like Tim Russert and Chris Matthews use the term freely, something they wouldn't do if the term was considered a pejorative code word for jewish republicans.
59
posted on
09/14/2003 2:46:13 PM PDT
by
zacyak
To: montag813
I am so sick of this self-hating Jew Kuttner. Mr. Kuttner is proud to be a Jew and he does not have any "self-hatred". Do not be quick with passing false accusations.
60
posted on
09/14/2003 2:47:08 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson