Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
There have been so many inaccuracies in messages on this forum, I find it hilarious.

Yes, Bruce is a liberal, and I'm sure he doesn't like Bush, but his impeachment comment was *tongue-in-cheek*. He always has lighthearted comments when he introduces Clarence. He proclaimed Clarence the next president of the United States in '99 with Al Gore in the audience. In London, he said he was the next king of England. In California, he was introduced as the next governor of California. It was a freaking joke! He did not chant "Impeach! Impeach!" That's completely made up out of thin air.

A few other inaccuracies:
-Bruce has never been into drugs and was certainly not drunk on TV
-He was not named most rude, unpleasant artist in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. In fact, he's usually named as one of the friendliest in the business.
-His song American Skin (41 Shots) was not attacking the police. Right wingers assumed that without even hearing the lyrics.
-Concerning his sexual attraction to his sister, Mary... uhhh, he doesn't even have a sister named Mary
-He did have poor ticket sales in Buffalo, but the new venue doesn't seat 2000 (multiply that by 10)
-He is a has-been and not popular anymore?? He just sold out 10 nights at Giants Stadium (550,000 tickets). *Nobody* has *ever* sold that many tickets. Then there are the multiple stadium sell-outs in Boston, Philly, etc.
-Bruce didn't steal Max Weinberg from Southside Johnny's band because he was never in it

That's only a few of the inaccuracies. Where do you people come up with this stuff?? The knee-jerk reactions without any facts are exactly what Al Franken talks about in his book. Talk about blowing things out of proportion!! 300+ messages about a lighthearted introduction to his sax player??
319 posted on 09/14/2003 9:21:32 PM PDT by badlands57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]


To: badlands57
I didn't post the inaccurate stuff. I stand by my reporting from last night. He was serious about it.
320 posted on 09/14/2003 9:37:19 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: badlands57
I'm sure he doesn't like Bush, but his impeachment comment was *tongue-in-cheek*. He always has lighthearted comments when he introduces Clarence. He proclaimed Clarence the next president of the United States in '99 with Al Gore in the audience. In London, he said he was the next king of England. In California, he was introduced as the next governor of California.

Bruce spoke up for the Dixie Chicks, and knows what they said, which didn't even come close to suggesting that Bush be replaced. He could have made his "tongue-in-cheek" comments about Clarence being the next president without mentioned impeachment or the "mess." Those references take the introduction out of the realm of humor and into the realm of serious, real-life issues.

If you want to believe that this was an innocent remark blown out of proportion, you must think that Bruce is an idiot, inviting Dixie Chicks treatment when he doesn't didn't have to.

323 posted on 09/14/2003 11:17:24 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson