Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiamondDon1
"We should begin with Strength, then bargain in order to advance our agenda..."

All fine, but what is our bargaining "strength" with a Socialist lege slightly to the right of the USSR politburo and a Davis/Bustamante combo owning the Governorship???

The GOP in Cali *has nothing*! Not a single statewide office. Conservatives?!?! They have even less - not only dont they have no power or office, they have a populace indifferent and a powerful media hostile to them.

The first step is getting into the arena. WINNING. Any fine words are hollow if you let defeat get snatched out of the jaws of victory here. Merely choosing Milton Friedman over Karl Marx is a massive step in the right direction over where Cali is going in the hands of Democrats.

So let this be a simple rule - first, do no harm: The first task is removing Davis and making sure Bustamante does *not* win the Governorship.

To implement that, unity is needed. From unity comes strength, from strength comes the ability to win some points and advance the agenda. Failing to win this election over Bustamante WILL BE HUGE SETBACK FOR THE CONSERVAITVE CAUSE. It will be made worse if conservatives are "blamed" for the division or if it deepened conservative vs. moderate divisions in the GOP.

63 posted on 09/14/2003 1:09:40 PM PDT by WOSG (Dont put Cali on CRUZ CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
Hello WOSG!

The first step is getting into the arena. WINNING. Any fine words are hollow if you let defeat get snatched out of the jaws of victory here. Merely choosing Milton Friedman over Karl Marx is a massive step in the right direction over where Cali is going in the hands of Democrats.

While I agree with you about the need to win, it is how you get there that makes or breaks you. If we simply adopt the left's agenda and run a candidate with an "R", we will win. Great, we advance their agenda but we won.

So the next course of action would be to run a "stealth" candidate, one who campaigns on liberal issues but is really a conservative. Now you have deceaved the electorate and prove you cannot be trusted.

So finally we put out an actual conservative and show the State what we actually are. If the people don't want us, we should not win. However, most people when you get past the media influence actually agree with us.

So right or wrong, I believe we cannot put forth candidates that are "pale pastels", but need to put forth candidates that use "bold colors" to define who we are.

Lastly, before you talk about Simon (which is the argument against the above) Simon ran a horrible campaign and was going against a Governor that raised more money with his "cash for policy" programs.

Have a nice day!

DD

68 posted on 09/15/2003 9:50:46 AM PDT by DiamondDon1 (Official Tombot, Member VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson