Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmstein7
I cetainly hope JW accomplishes more with this situation than it did with its case against Dick Cheney and Haliburton. You know, the much-ballyhooed (by JW and anti-Bush interests) case that was dismissed the other day because JW never followed up and did any discovery? [It was a nuisance case after all.] However, as much as I disrespect Klayman, I do hope that he is able to use Peter Paul to shine light on the Clinton's dirty dealings.
8 posted on 09/13/2003 10:02:00 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
Any idea what they're talking about now? I had to tune in on the net, and they're in commercial.
9 posted on 09/13/2003 10:04:13 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
Don't count on it.
15 posted on 09/13/2003 10:15:13 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
However, as much as I disrespect Klayman, I do hope that he is able to use Peter Paul to shine light on the Clinton's dirty dealings.

You must remember, it's Judicial Watch you're talking about here. When have they ever accomplished anything other than lining Larry Klayman's pockets?

19 posted on 09/13/2003 10:25:11 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson