To: jmstein7
I cetainly hope JW accomplishes more with this situation than it did with its case against Dick Cheney and Haliburton. You know, the much-ballyhooed (by JW and anti-Bush interests) case that was dismissed the other day because JW never followed up and did any discovery? [It was a nuisance case after all.] However, as much as I disrespect Klayman, I do hope that he is able to use Peter Paul to shine light on the Clinton's dirty dealings.
8 posted on
09/13/2003 10:02:00 AM PDT by
Clara Lou
To: Clara Lou
Any idea what they're talking about now? I had to tune in on the net, and they're in commercial.
9 posted on
09/13/2003 10:04:13 AM PDT by
jmstein7
To: Clara Lou
Don't count on it.
15 posted on
09/13/2003 10:15:13 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Clara Lou
However, as much as I disrespect Klayman, I do hope that he is able to use Peter Paul to shine light on the Clinton's dirty dealings. You must remember, it's Judicial Watch you're talking about here. When have they ever accomplished anything other than lining Larry Klayman's pockets?
19 posted on
09/13/2003 10:25:11 AM PDT by
Amelia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson