To: *calgov2002
.
2 posted on
09/13/2003 9:35:19 AM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi .. Logic , of late, flies in the face on convention AND principles in California.)
To: NormsRevenge
That arrangement, said a half-dozen immigration attorneys across the nation, appears to have violated the terms of his visa.Don't make me PUKE; immigration attorneys spend their entire lives getting CRIMINALS into this country.
4 posted on
09/13/2003 9:37:35 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: NormsRevenge
From the article "Several immigration attorneys said the federal government was much more lax in the 1960s and 1970s in enforcing immigration laws ..."
The implication is that they are enforcing them strictly now. Does anyone believe this?
7 posted on
09/13/2003 9:41:49 AM PDT by
jocon307
(Boy, even I am surprised at myself!)
To: NormsRevenge
So Arnold drew a salary on a B-1 visa roughly 30 years ago.
Obviously, we don't care about this any more than we cared about the fact that a President we elected dodged the draft with trickery and then skipping off to Oxford more than 30 years ago.
If the latter is no big deal (as apparently it was), then the former is mere trivia. Right?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson