Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Opinions (Is the prescription-drug bill dead?)
National Review ^ | 9/12/03 | Ramesh Ponura

Posted on 09/13/2003 7:32:46 AM PDT by truthandlife

During the August recess, congressional Republicans heard plenty from constituents about the prescription-drug bill — all of it bad. Liberals and the AARP have ginned up opposition to the bill as too stingy. Conservatives say it costs too much. And everyone worries that the bill will give many seniors worse coverage than they already have.

The administration has long recognized this last point, but argued that under current trends people were going to lose their drug coverage anyway. But this response never made much political sense. Put yourself in the place of a congressman. Your constituents are going to lose their drug coverage no matter what you do. Would you rather they blame their health plan, or you? Congressmen may not know much about health care, but that question they can answer.

So the probability that the bill will fall apart is going up.

The House Republican leadership has been sticking to a strategy favored by conservatives. When the conference committee to reconcile the House and Senate versions of the bill comes back, they want the Senate to move on it first. They want the Senate to pass a bill with 51 votes — i.e., a bill that doesn't make a single unnecessary compromise with liberals. If the Senate can't do that, the House leaders don't want to take up the issue. Some Republican leaders, notably RNC chairman Ed Gillespie, have been claiming that the Senate Republicans can indeed pass a bill over Ted Kennedy's objections. But it's not clear, at least to me, what the coalition of 51 would look like. Will Chafee and Snowe get behind a bill that Kennedy isn't?

If the bill collapses, that doesn't mean that Congress will do nothing about prescription drugs. There is always the option of passing a stripped-down bill that covers only seniors with particularly acute needs. Such a bill would be closer to $40 billion than $400 billion. Perhaps a few small reforms to Medicare would be thrown in. For anything larger, Republicans would come back in two years — with, they hope, a larger Senate majority.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: drugs; healthcare; house; medicare; prescriptiondrugs; rameshponnuru; republicans
We can only hope and write our congressmen.
1 posted on 09/13/2003 7:32:47 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
HALLELUJAH

2 posted on 09/13/2003 7:37:43 AM PDT by AAABEST (I phoned the pest control department and their response was to send me a leaflet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
B-u-t, this is the Republican answer to the Democrat's campaign issues by taking the issue away and spending more than the Democrats in the process. We just cannot let this happen. What could we do without spending more so that the Republicans could be reelected to spend more?
3 posted on 09/13/2003 9:55:52 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
For as much as the media hypes this as an issue, most people who understand the issue are against it. It would hurt far more folks than it would help. And it will cost tens of billions of dollars more than has been estimated.

Here's hoping it dies.

4 posted on 09/13/2003 9:58:14 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
BUMP
5 posted on 09/15/2003 6:14:47 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson