[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

I can think of another word that describes the redefinitionary nature of this article: Marxist.

This article, and the (R)nold Groupies rationalizing for it on this thread, its sincerely a NEW LOW that I honestly never saw coming. I don't know if its based on Tom's numbers continuing steadly to climb as their only hope stagnates or the closeness of the election, but this is without question the stupidest thing I've ever seen fellow Republicans try to say in the name of Partisanship. Even he says he's a social liberal.

[strela]

I don't know if its based on Tom's numbers continuing steadly to climb

Which recent poll shows McClintock's numbers "steadily climbing?" Post a link please.

[cyncooper]

This article, and the (R)nold Groupies rationalizing for it on this thread,

Can you cite one post rationalizing the article?

I think pro-Schwarzenegger comments have been about him being a real Republican and conservative in some areas and not in others, but I don't think I've even seen ONE post supporting the article, per se, and claiming he's really "socially conservative" as freepers would use the term.

But I tend to skim when I read, so if you could point one out to me, I'd appreciate it.