Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Social Conservative
Intellectual Conservative ^ | September 12, 2003 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 09/12/2003 12:19:04 PM PDT by EllaMinnow

Social conservatism means a serious fidelity to those beliefs and traditions which keep us civilized and decent.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is a social conservative, despite much rhetoric to the contrary. Social conservatism means a serious fidelity to those beliefs and traditions which keep us civilized and decent without resort to laws, regulations and bureaucrats.

Social conservatism is a respect for tradition and for values which have withstood the test of time. Chinese family members who respect and support one another, even at the cost of personal wishes, are social conservatives whatever their metaphysical beliefs.

This definition of social conservatism as a matter of example rather than profession does not mean we agree on every detail of moral behavior. It means instead that we root ourselves in something permanent, dignified and civic. Even eccentricity can be socially conservative. British and American peoples are famous for producing men who, for want of a better term, are cranks. That is very much a part of the culture of these two nations.

At the heart of social conservatism is fidelity. Often men who are social conservatives are ideologically left of center. Jimmy Carter is a good example. By all appearances, Carter took his marital vows seriously and his religious faith seriously. He stopped serving hard liquor at White House dinners.

That did not prevent Carter from being a petty, spiteful and almost insufferable boor. And it certainly did not prevent Carter from being wrong on almost every issue. But it does mean that Jimmy Carter was a social conservative.

Joe Lieberman is also a social conservative, even if he supports terrible policies. Every indication is that Lieberman is a religiously serious Orthodox Jew. It is impossible to imagine Joe munching a bacon cheeseburger on Kol Nidre. Bill Bradley is another social conservative who loves his wife, gained his wealth and fame through guts and hard work, and sincerely believes in all the bad ideas he proposes.

The beauty of America, of course, is that social conservatism does not require being correct as much as being sincere. It does not require conformity to a particular catechism so much as it means conformity to some catechism. The bewildering variety of religions, sects, and societies in American life is a testament to Americans respecting in social life the same freedom to be wrong that we respect in our economic life. Indeed, social conservatism is another form of market choice which helps, through competition, to elevate cultures and traditions within America.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is made of the "right stuff.” There is no odor of phoniness about him. He loves his wife and family. He worked his way to the top with sweat and diligence. He resembles a number of other social conservative Republicans around President Bush who are not generally recognized as social conservatives.

Who? How about Colin Powell? He turned down the Presidency itself in 1996 out of respect for his wife and family. Does anyone question that what Powell believes, he believes sincerely? How about Tom Ridge, who was too liberal to be the running mate in 2000, but who putters around his home for recreation and grew up in the Marine Corps.

Tony Blair and Rudy Giuliani are social conservatives who we seldom see as social conservatives. Both these heroic figures do what they do publicly and because they believe it is right. Thank goodness both are on our side now--social conservatives dig their heels in very deeply!--but even when Giuliani supports abortion or Powell supports affirmative action, they can do so looking you straight in the eye with a polygraph examiner unable to detect a hint of spin in their answers.

This type of social conservative--guys doing what they think is right because they think it is right--is precisely the sort of man that President Bush has shown incredible skill in using to make America better. Our Texan President, our proudly Cowboy President, does not demand that anyone agree with him on every issue. In fact, such silly boys can be skimmed off the corporate boards of a hundred big companies.

He wants people who are true to themselves. He wants, and we should want, real social conservatives. Rabbis who read Torah as if it were holy writ. Priests who take their vows seriously. Men who honor their parents and are faithful to their wives. Men like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Ronald Reagan or John Wayne, who will fight for what they think is right.

When Governor Schwarzenegger takes office, President Bush will find honor more valuable than agreement and grit more important than obedience. It will be a winning team, perhaps a team that can transform America.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 561-567 next last
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Here's what he says -

"I am firmly opposed to raising taxes. Californians are already overtaxed. California has one of the highest tax burdens in the nation, and just about everything a Californian does today is subject to one tax or another. From the moment you get up in the morning until you go to bed at night, the tax collector is there to take a share - at your home, in your car, at the gas station, at the restaurant, and just about everywhere else you go and everything else you do.

It's unfair to accept the notion that hitting taxpayers up for more money is the answer to our state's budget and economic problems. Politicians in Sacramento should find a better way to turn things around – not simply shift the burden of their mistakes onto the backs of taxpayers."

http://www.joinarnold.com/en/agenda/arnoldsviews.php#C1
281 posted on 09/12/2003 2:38:12 PM PDT by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
Last time I'll tell you - either reference candidates who are actually running in the California governor's race or shut up and go troll another thread.

Good day.

282 posted on 09/12/2003 2:38:12 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Is it possible for you to answer a simple yes or no question?
283 posted on 09/12/2003 2:38:43 PM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
If you look at the majority of posters who have thought this whole article is a joke, you will probably find out they have been on FR a while and are just offended by the whole premise of this article.

I repeat my quote: "The Force (or the paid disruptors) has a strong influence on the weak-minded."

284 posted on 09/12/2003 2:40:03 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
Arnold says...I am firmly opposed to raising taxes.


Okay, now you know there are different levels of "firmness"..lol.
285 posted on 09/12/2003 2:40:10 PM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
Pete Wilson said the same thing nearly word for word, then he gave us the largest state tax increase in US history because of a then "big" $3billion debt. Of course, that only caused the same debt to balloon to $14 because you don't make money on large tax increases, you actually decrease it by stifling economic activity.

Plus I'm well aware of what (R)nold says, his lack of a no new tax pledge distrurbs me greatly given the other details, I am asking if you, Weimdog, BELIEVE he will or will not raise the taxes?


286 posted on 09/12/2003 2:41:59 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA ((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
#258 LOL! Oh man, you have to stop that, I'm laughing so hard I've almost wet my pants! LOL!
287 posted on 09/12/2003 2:42:19 PM PDT by shellylet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
a great doctor

Ah, so you do admit that Tom is the superior candidate? Great!

All that leaves us is to show you how he can win!

Keep your powder dry, man...

288 posted on 09/12/2003 2:44:41 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Why should I answer your question when you didn't even respond to mine last night. In fact you became very silent and really show you being very hypocritical. I will say it again, Registered it is very ironic that you put up a doctored picture on 5/2/03 joking about Scott Peterson having his own Planned Parenthood by killing Lacy's child in the womb (you took the picture down for some reason)The Scott Peterson Planned Parenthood Center of Modesto and now you are supporting a pro-abort candidate because he can win and has an R after his name. What is the difference between what Scott Peterson did to that baby and what an abortion doctor does? Very ironic.

Again since you are so good at doctoring pictures (especially showing the horrors of abortion), maybe you could put Arnold standing at the podium with one live baby in his hand and an aborted baby in the other and give him the caption, "I am against partial birth abortion but to this baby in my left hand, 'Hasta La Vista Baby.'

289 posted on 09/12/2003 2:45:19 PM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife; Registered
Why should I answer your question when you didn't even respond to mine last night.

Jim R. has asked repeatedly that material from one thread not be dragged into another, and has asked that "cross-thread" flamewars not be engaged in.

Now then, are you ever going to answer Registered's question posted in THIS thread?

290 posted on 09/12/2003 2:47:03 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'm sure he will cream Boxer.

Now if we can just get that horse's head out of the grain bucket and back to the round pen.
291 posted on 09/12/2003 2:47:46 PM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: strela
"The Force (or the paid disruptors) has a strong influence on the weak-minded."

It is interesting but if you click on everyone's name who have thought this whole article is a joke, you will find most of the posters are Freepers that have been here for a while.

I wish I was getting paid to defend conservative principles. That would be a pretty fun job.

292 posted on 09/12/2003 2:49:04 PM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
Your Post 252 is conspicuous in its absence. Wonder why?
293 posted on 09/12/2003 2:49:28 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

Comment #294 Removed by Moderator

To: Bluntpoint
I'm sure he will cream Boxer.

But...but...we've been assured here by the Schwarzeneggies that no conservative candidate will ever win in California AGAIN!?!?!

How can this be?

295 posted on 09/12/2003 2:50:44 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: strela
I must assume that you think he is not "socially conservative" enough then take that assumption to its logical conclusion.

Are you brain dead? He is not socially conservative at all. Unless you want to redefine social conservative with this joke of an article.

296 posted on 09/12/2003 2:51:21 PM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: strela; Admin Moderator
Your Post 252 is conspicuous in its absence. Wonder why?

I dunno why...could it be you cried like a baby?

Perhaps someone could fill me in?

297 posted on 09/12/2003 2:52:26 PM PDT by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: jscd3
Actually, wasn't it "like a virgin?"
298 posted on 09/12/2003 2:53:29 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Human life doesn't contract and expand, however, and spiritally poverty does not beget trimmed budgeting, but rather simply graver spiritual poverty. Thus, original sin prevents classical liberalism from functioning within a human being. This is why classical economic liberals did not uniformly become social libertines. (John Stuart Mills did, of course, but he was insane!)

What in the HELL(o) are you talking about?

If Mills was insane, his was a form of insanity that would serve a few nations well (French, Germany). Not to mention the UN.

The following quote shouldn't be to hard for even YOU to follow. It sums up well the HEROISM of our troops serving this nation. Tell me if you think John Stuart Mills is so "insane" when you are done reading and contemplating it. Read on:

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

~~ John Stuart Mill ~~

Yeah, I'll tell you.. that John Stuart Mills, I don't know how he tied his shoes. He was such a wild and CRAZY guy!!

LOL

299 posted on 09/12/2003 2:53:35 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: Where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

I invented Tom McClintock, so you should go vote for him.

Si, Gringo I want drrrrriiiiivvvvveeeee!!!

300 posted on 09/12/2003 2:53:48 PM PDT by Tempest (I've lost all hope for half of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 561-567 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson