Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Social Conservative
Intellectual Conservative ^ | September 12, 2003 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 09/12/2003 12:19:04 PM PDT by EllaMinnow

Social conservatism means a serious fidelity to those beliefs and traditions which keep us civilized and decent.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is a social conservative, despite much rhetoric to the contrary. Social conservatism means a serious fidelity to those beliefs and traditions which keep us civilized and decent without resort to laws, regulations and bureaucrats.

Social conservatism is a respect for tradition and for values which have withstood the test of time. Chinese family members who respect and support one another, even at the cost of personal wishes, are social conservatives whatever their metaphysical beliefs.

This definition of social conservatism as a matter of example rather than profession does not mean we agree on every detail of moral behavior. It means instead that we root ourselves in something permanent, dignified and civic. Even eccentricity can be socially conservative. British and American peoples are famous for producing men who, for want of a better term, are cranks. That is very much a part of the culture of these two nations.

At the heart of social conservatism is fidelity. Often men who are social conservatives are ideologically left of center. Jimmy Carter is a good example. By all appearances, Carter took his marital vows seriously and his religious faith seriously. He stopped serving hard liquor at White House dinners.

That did not prevent Carter from being a petty, spiteful and almost insufferable boor. And it certainly did not prevent Carter from being wrong on almost every issue. But it does mean that Jimmy Carter was a social conservative.

Joe Lieberman is also a social conservative, even if he supports terrible policies. Every indication is that Lieberman is a religiously serious Orthodox Jew. It is impossible to imagine Joe munching a bacon cheeseburger on Kol Nidre. Bill Bradley is another social conservative who loves his wife, gained his wealth and fame through guts and hard work, and sincerely believes in all the bad ideas he proposes.

The beauty of America, of course, is that social conservatism does not require being correct as much as being sincere. It does not require conformity to a particular catechism so much as it means conformity to some catechism. The bewildering variety of religions, sects, and societies in American life is a testament to Americans respecting in social life the same freedom to be wrong that we respect in our economic life. Indeed, social conservatism is another form of market choice which helps, through competition, to elevate cultures and traditions within America.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is made of the "right stuff.” There is no odor of phoniness about him. He loves his wife and family. He worked his way to the top with sweat and diligence. He resembles a number of other social conservative Republicans around President Bush who are not generally recognized as social conservatives.

Who? How about Colin Powell? He turned down the Presidency itself in 1996 out of respect for his wife and family. Does anyone question that what Powell believes, he believes sincerely? How about Tom Ridge, who was too liberal to be the running mate in 2000, but who putters around his home for recreation and grew up in the Marine Corps.

Tony Blair and Rudy Giuliani are social conservatives who we seldom see as social conservatives. Both these heroic figures do what they do publicly and because they believe it is right. Thank goodness both are on our side now--social conservatives dig their heels in very deeply!--but even when Giuliani supports abortion or Powell supports affirmative action, they can do so looking you straight in the eye with a polygraph examiner unable to detect a hint of spin in their answers.

This type of social conservative--guys doing what they think is right because they think it is right--is precisely the sort of man that President Bush has shown incredible skill in using to make America better. Our Texan President, our proudly Cowboy President, does not demand that anyone agree with him on every issue. In fact, such silly boys can be skimmed off the corporate boards of a hundred big companies.

He wants people who are true to themselves. He wants, and we should want, real social conservatives. Rabbis who read Torah as if it were holy writ. Priests who take their vows seriously. Men who honor their parents and are faithful to their wives. Men like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Ronald Reagan or John Wayne, who will fight for what they think is right.

When Governor Schwarzenegger takes office, President Bush will find honor more valuable than agreement and grit more important than obedience. It will be a winning team, perhaps a team that can transform America.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 561-567 next last
To: Itzlzha
... Hint...does the term "Right-Wing Crazies" sound familiar? ...

Dang right it does! There are about a dozen of 'em here. Danged good description!

241 posted on 09/12/2003 2:20:38 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: strela
Another poster who believes everything that the LA Times tells him

No, unlike you I know when I'm being lied to... I suspect McClintock's numbers would be higher in a real State-Wide poll, as they will be on election day.

However, have all you Arn-holes disavowed YOUR candidates numbers in their polls? I seem to see his hacks on TV touting his poll results...disingenuous much?

242 posted on 09/12/2003 2:20:39 PM PDT by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: DiamondDon1
WELCOME TO FLAME WARS...

I thought it was called "Recall Wars" but either way is good.


243 posted on 09/12/2003 2:20:59 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA ((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
When SchwarzenKennedy makes a policy statemnt ...

I don't know of anybody by that name running in the California recall election.

(personal attacks deleted)

No, but the closest to him IS...McClintock.

McClintock hasn't got a prayer of winning. Schwarzenegger does.

Try harder.

I have. It didn't help. Use the names of real candidates running in this race.

Care to debate ISSUES now?

Coming from somebody who floats the names of mythical candidates, a request to "debate issues" is laughable.

244 posted on 09/12/2003 2:21:01 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
On the contrary, I've seen lots of pro-Schwarzenegger supporters posting here. Its hard to follow the thread sometimes though because the idiots and Bustamante supporters (but I repeat myself) posting here are thick as fleas.
245 posted on 09/12/2003 2:23:14 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

246 posted on 09/12/2003 2:23:18 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
This Bruce Walker appears to dwell on the outer limits of the twilight zone...

But...but...he's an INTELLECTUAL! ;-)

247 posted on 09/12/2003 2:23:18 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: strela
I'd rather starve waiting for someone I acually believed shared my values, than sit down to a bountiful dinner table with a pro-life, anti-gun, pro-tax amateur whose core beliefs are much closer to those espoused by Cruz than McClintock.
248 posted on 09/12/2003 2:23:25 PM PDT by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
You're cruel! Pointedly honest, but cruel!

Go Arnold

249 posted on 09/12/2003 2:23:40 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: strela
I once had a tumor growing inside me. It was going to kill me. To excise that tumor all at once would have killed me also.

The doctors reccommended multiple small surguries to remove it.

I said "Hell no, all or nothing doc!"

The feller down at the funeral home has been real nice with all the pre-arrangement details.
250 posted on 09/12/2003 2:25:31 PM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
"I AM VERY LIBERAL ON SOCIAL ISSUES"-- ARNOLD SCHWARTZENEGGER
251 posted on 09/12/2003 2:25:39 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #252 Removed by Moderator

To: strela
Actually, I'm very happy you're here with everything hanging out for all to see. It's good for the lurkers.

Carry on...
253 posted on 09/12/2003 2:26:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I just want to gag when I hear that phrase these days.

Go ahead a gag, hurl, spew. Maybe it will rid you of some of your bile.

254 posted on 09/12/2003 2:26:53 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: strela
By stating in so many words that you would only vote for pure "social conservatives" while presumably espousing support for people like President Bush who are arguably nothing of the kind.

Did I say I would vote for pure "social conservatives?" Thanks for puting words in my mouth. I will at least vote for a candidate that has some social conservative beliefs not a candidate who hardly supports one social conservative issue.

To compare Bush and Arnold is a joke. I don't agree with Bush on all of the issues he supports but at least he actually does support a lot of social conservative issues.

Let's see if there is a similarity in Arnold and GW Bush on social conservative issues.

What does Bush believe on domestic partnerships? Arnold believe (domestic partnership law)?

What does Bush believe on gay rights, including adoption rights? Arnold believe?

What does Bush believe on abortion? Arnold believe?

What does Bush believe on the medical use of marijuana? Arnold believe?

Yeah I would say Bush and Arnold agree on every everything social conservatives believe.

255 posted on 09/12/2003 2:27:39 PM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: dangus
YES! Go Arnold!
256 posted on 09/12/2003 2:28:06 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

Comment #257 Removed by Moderator

To: ninenot; SteveH

If I was still in your country I'd ask for you to vote for McClintock so that I might get back in.

Si, Republicanos should vote for McClintocko he is very Mucho Grande to us.

If not for them do it for us. Because Tom is the true Social conservative

258 posted on 09/12/2003 2:28:19 PM PDT by Tempest (I've lost all hope for half of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Are you going to support Bustagroove if Tom drops out? Yes or no will suffice.
259 posted on 09/12/2003 2:29:05 PM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
No, unlike you I know when I'm being lied to.

Then, if you know that the LA Times is lying to you, why represent their poll as the truth? That's just silly behavior (not to mention intellectually contradictory).

I suspect McClintock's numbers would be higher in a real State-Wide poll, as they will be on election day.

When McNugget can get more than 200 Koolaid drinkers to attend a campaign function where free food was handed out as a blandishment to attend, then you'll have some credence for your claim. Until then, we'll all just continue to laugh at your ludicrous claims.

However, have all you Arn-holes disavowed YOUR candidates numbers in their polls?

Why should we? THEY are based on actual voters, not the bias of the LA Times.

disingenuous much?

Pot kettle black

260 posted on 09/12/2003 2:29:13 PM PDT by strela (It is not true that Larry Flynt's biggest financial donor is Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 561-567 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson