[KQQL]

If the LA Times is underestimating the strength of support for Recall, then that means they are underweighting the number of Conservative Republicans that will show up.

Not correct....LA Times poll ...polled more conservatives than SURVEY USA and the FIELD POll...

and that's why their poll is screwed up....if MCClintock is at 18%..then why is the RECall at 50%... FIELD POLL and SURVEY USA have good track record in CA...

[Pubbie]

SurveyUSA had McClintock at 16%.

[DiamondDon1]

Not to barge into a stimulating debate (which means I barge in...)

Not correct....LA Times poll ...polled more conservatives than SURVEY USA and the FIELD POll...

and that's why their poll is screwed up....if MCClintock is at 18%..then why is the RECall at 50%... FIELD POLL and SURVEY USA have good track record in CA...

One explanation for the poll numbers is that Independent Voters (according to the Slimes) want McClintock more than Arnold (28 percent to 14 percent) which looks wierd.

According to their number conservatives favor Arnold (39 percent to 38 percent)...also wierd.

Moderates (whatever that means) perfer Arnold (21 percent to 10 percent) as would be expected.

So who are these Independents that want McClintock, and who are these Conservatives favoring Arnold?

This poll is like throwing darts, at a rotating dartboard, in a hurricane...

DD