Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ucfdeltagirl
ucfdeltagirl,

I will try as best I can to explain to you why your responses do not cut it.

I didn't put the students' names on this post to freerepublic because I don't want to subject these people to any misguided wrath without checking with them first to see if that's what they are up to.

These questions were proposed to President Hitt, not to you. If Hitt had answered these questions the way that you just did, he would be hounded out of office, and rightly so.

"Hippies?" I am not one, never was. Even if I were, what good is name calling of that sort? It does nothing to counter the arguments of the anti-flag position.

1. Since you are talking about my salary, I would like to point out that it comes from a number of sources, some of which is state money, but very little of it federal money. By that token, we should have a Florida state flag in the classrooms. In any case, I am somewhat underpaid and could make more in the private sector.

The research money that the defense department puts into UCF is returned in the form of research, not in the form of flags.

The classroom should be a space for free academic inquiry into core American values, behaviors, and values. It should not be used as a platform for promoting someone's narrow view of patriotism. It should not be used to test people's loyalty or allegiance to some narrow set of prescribed values.

As I mentioned to you before, I do not find the flag nor the country I live in to be offensive. I find a plan to force flags on people who don't want them offensive.

2. "Removing flags" is hardly vandalism. Let's say I remove a chair from a room. Is that vandalism? Not if it's still on university property and I return it to the room when I am through with the room.

I do not "indoctrinate." I teach. In fact, ask conservative students who have taken my classes in the past five years and they will tell you the same thing. What is good teaching? For one thing, it should probably make some people uncomfortable. So what if it does? This is a university, not a grade school.

I often teach texts by right wing artists and thinkers. Sometimes these texts make liberal students uncomfortable. Again, that is my job. I also teach the U.S. flag in class. I don't care if it makes people uncomfortable because it is part of a temporary learning situation in which the rules of dialogue apply. They are not officially-sanctioned flags, but flags used for the purpose of learning what a flag is.

Finally, I never said I would take down a flag. I am not stupid enough to fall for the trap that ROCK is trying to set for me and others like me who find their whole scheme to be a form of red-baiting and neo-McCarthyism.


3. As I said, I am not condoning vandalism against flags or anything else. The question about what the punishment is for vandalism, however, is appropriate to ask of the president.

Now, as for your insinuation that I might lose my tenure . . . the very suggestion on your part leads me to believe that all this talk of the flags symbolizing freedom is just hot air. The people proposing the flags intend to use them as bludgeons to punish ideological enemies.

Wouldn't you rather have tenure decisions based on academic qualifications and accomplishments rather than on some loyalty test set up by ROCK?

By the way, you should read about what happened to the universities in Germany during the Nazi period. They threw out academic standards too and went to loyalty tests, just as you are proposing.

4. The SGA considered many issues besides money in their consideration of the flag issue. Money seemed to me to be one of the least of their concerns. The greatest concern they had was that a great number of students didn't want the flags.

Your insinuation that NORML bribed SGA senators with pot for their "no" vote is disgusting and slanderous.

5. I don't think anyone would trust you with reports of harassment from ROCK members. The police have several reports and President Hitt is aware of them.

6. Tell me you love flags; I won't try to shut you down or shut you up. Put a flag on every surface you own. Eat flags for breakfast. I will have no complaint. Try to destroy the academic environment, however, and I will have a lot to say about it.

7. I have listened to Burke's show at least three times. He makes me sick with every sentence he says. I have little doubt that the website about him is accurate. However, I am willing to listen to the tapes of his shows to verify it. Do you have them?

8. I am not against flags, just as I am not against classrooms. I am against flags in classrooms, especially at public universities, because we need a free space for academic inquiry into American values.

You can contact ROCK by taking a right. Go for a while and take another right. Keep taking rights until you can go no further. That's where ROCK is.

Barry
30 posted on 09/14/2003 2:59:24 PM PDT by bmauer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: bmauer
The classroom should be a space for free academic inquiry into core American values, behaviors, and values. It should not be used as a platform for promoting someone's narrow view of patriotism. It should not be used to test people's loyalty or allegiance to some narrow set of prescribed values.

Good heavens! The American flag represents political diversity, not narrow values. Do you think freedom and limited government (to the extend we still have either) are "narrow values?" Do you think American patriotism is a narrow value? Since most universities are bastions of socialism--er, liberalism, do you think conservatism (part of the political diversity) is a narrow value (not that I'm suggesting the flag advances a conservative agenda)???

51 posted on 09/18/2003 8:23:26 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Get on your camel and ride! ~Kool and the Gang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson