Replies

Let's wait until this lunatic has enough nuke missiles to anihilate all our large cities, and then say that we should have nuked him years before.

You moron. Idiot. Jumping to conclusions like that.

Us morally superior intelligent types got just one thing to say to you.
You don't have any proof!

We want videos, photographs, 18 notarized confessions, a note from El Nutso's mother, then get back to us.
Warmonger!

where are the WMDs dammit!

IMO, Iraqi WMD proof will surface right before the election of 2004. We are collecting it as you read. Do you really want to go down this road? To use a comedic metaphor: You're the straightguy being set up for a very funny punchline!

At this point we have proof of his other weapon of mass destruction in the Iraqi killing fields. Saddam is looking more and more like Pol Pot everyday.

Anyway, seems to me that striking Saddam prior to his acquisition of nukes was best strategy. Don't you? The proof is with NK: We can't simply attack NK NOW with the nuclear threat in the mix! If Saddam was in the same position as NK is now we could not attack Iraq the same way. This is precisely the reason for Israel's pre-emptive strike on Iraqi (French) nuclear reactor in 1981 (You remember the Israeli strike when all the world condemned them as insane. Even The Clash lampooned Israel in "Rock The Casbah"--this is not kosher). Israel knew that Saddam would use the threat card once he acquired the nukes. Moreover, the Israeli's knew that once nukes were acquired then the entire arab world would be emboldened to destroy her. Nukes change the debate, just look at our handling of Pakistan.

Further, NK was Saddam's ally. This newest NK nuke development was known by the Bush team. The scenario of our troops prepared to attack as a NK nuke shows up in Iraq would have been a miserable miscalculation on our part. NK was sending everything else to Saddam, why not a nuke? Come on, publius: Let's use logic and reason in this matter, rather than mindless slogans.

My only hope is that we extract the NK cancer before it spreads. Otherwise, you and I are a short-list for nuclear destruction.

Finally, your tagline is silly. CA recall is in their constitution. It's law! Lest you forget, Grey Davis sought recall proceedings in 1989.