Oh, I get it. You watched the OJ trial. Silly me.
And what was the nature of the trial in question ?
It’s not in question. It was a very real part of my life. But I'd like to know...are you attempting to add to your vast knowledge of juries, or are you just curious?
Shall I say, they prefer "gullible" idiots. I didn't say the prosecutors like it.
That sounds an awful lot like backpedaling to me. Someone can be gullible without being an idiot, can they not? And I’ve never said you made such a claim of prosecutors...have I? I merely said prosecutors would not allow it because they won't. But you already knew that, being an expert on juries and all.
Now, now. That sounds like a personal insult. You know those aren't tolerated on FR, don't you ? :-)
There's no reason for you to take it that way. What I meant was perhaps they just didn't want a jury expert like you on their jury. Can’t say I blame them. :)
Yes.