Because the unaccountable cretins infesting it (read: Gerry Parsky) insist on shoving liberals down our throats that do NOTHING to further the Conservative agenda. They are nothing but Country-Club elitists that want to impress the Thurston and Lovey Howells of the party and couldn't care less about the middle and working class that make up the bulk of CA voters. Is it no wonder when we nominate those liberal RINOs that they lose so badly every time they run. Why vote for a liberal RINO when there's plenty of Democrats to vote for ? You're fortunate to be in Indiana where they can coalesce behind someone of the calibre of Mitch Daniels. Tell me if you'd feel the same way if they enticed Julia Carson to serve as the GOP standard-bearer.
Republicans in Indiana have sense. McIntosh, who is far more conservative than McDaniels, dropped out and threw his support behind Mitch. He learned his lesson about the electorate here, and decided that winning the governorship was the most important. I worked on the McIntosh campaign, so I know that this was done because of his concern for the state.
No one in Indiana would try to force Julia Carson on us, and I do not think Arnold could even remotely be considered the equivalent of Julia Carson.
Nice try, but I want a Republican win in California, and I want the McClintock and Schwartzenegger people to get together and work out a deal.
To quote Vince Lombardi, "Winning is the only thing."