What are we supposed to get from this? Are we supposed to all celebrate your ignorance? I actually read the whole thing (imagine that!)
Aside from the distastefull part of attempting to show pictures to the family at a funeral, I thought it was an interesting article, and it addressed a question that many of us had - who was that man? Did he have a family? What else was he known for, besided the famous photograph. But then you can have no comment on that because you couldn't actaully finish the article.
I was referring to the author's praise of the stupid so-called "artwork" of a naked woman that was displayed in Rockfeller Center as being somehow "definitive" of 9-11. Many New Yorkers felt the same way. I was not referring to the photograph of the falling man. Now if you claim that you actually read the entire article, your level of reading comprehension is way down.