Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
I agree that this has been discussed and discussed. . . months ago. I too do not see a point in further discussion. But my truthfulness was impugned. I saw that what I said about the Idaho authorities could be interpreted in a manner I did not intend. I attempted to correct that.

The oldest daughter was injured during U.S. Air Force recruit training. AF doctors did suggest problems stemming from childhood. The family's problems were more recent than that.

We obviously disagree. But I would be remiss to not point out that the mother was in fact seeking help when she accepted a policeman's offer of a ride to the Social Security office. She never made it there.

Your second paragraph is accurate except IMO the mother was in fact seeking help. I also believe that local authorities offered to help the family with their back taxes months earlier but were refused. I will always believe those who argue that the developers who acquired the property wanted the family off their property.

73 posted on 09/11/2003 8:48:30 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamofCarmichael
It never had to get to the point where developers could even get into the picture.

I did not mean to imply you were lying in your earlier statement. If you took it that way I am sorry.

74 posted on 09/11/2003 10:10:30 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson