So you are defending a father who abandoned his children? That is acceptable behavior in your world? It is inexcuseable in mine. Leaving children without resources is immoral, against all religions' belief and, in times past, would have received universal condemnation (except from those who do the same.)
It is irrelevent that this scum bag could not get along with the mother for whatever reason. The point is that he abandoned his children. That is not the behavior of a MAN but rather a spoiled, irresponsible, thoughtless and immature BRAT.
So you are defending a father who abandoned his children? That is acceptable behavior in your world? What I'm doing is commenting on what I read in the article and pointing out that the responsibility for the child was the mother's, and that you know jack about the father.
If that's a problem to you, don't wait for me to care.
That is not the behavior of a MAN but rather a spoiled, irresponsible, thoughtless and immature BRAT.
LOL -- Oh, you mean speculating about all sorts of things rather than dealing with the actual facts of the case?