To: familyofman
To keep trying to blame a former POTUS for actions taken by the current POTUS is at best childish & way off point. The point is - we wouldn't be fighting terrorism today like we are had Clinton done his job. Instead, he spent more on Democrat vote buying than securing the naton against terrorism.
I think the Democrats have a lot of nerve asking Bush about the cost of a war that's here because of them. Now, it's gong to cost whatever - because someone has to clean up the mess Clinton left us in.
If they don't like where we are today, they should ask themselves how we got here in the first place.
NOT bring up Clinton on this issue is over looking the facts. If anything, the cost of the war should be charged to the DNC because of their neglect.
24 posted on
09/09/2003 6:58:00 AM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
"I think the Democrats have a lot of nerve asking Bush about the cost of a war that's here because of them."
I don't recall the dims forcing GWB to invade Iraq. Trying to blame everything on the dims is not a winning strategy - it takes away from the real point. What is the CIC going to do today & tomorrow?
Get over WJC - he's not been in office for over 2 years. Either GWB is our POTUS, or he isn't. We look to our current leaders for answers, not former ones.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson