[general_re]

Giving a long list of true facts does not prove evolution.

You rejected that exact same criticism when I pointed it out about one of your articles purporting to "disprove" evolution.

And people say you don't remember things - nice to see that my posts get recycled ;)

[VadeRetro]

And people say you don't remember things ...

You can't remember what Morton's Demon never lets in.

[gore3000]

You rejected that exact same criticism when I pointed it out about one of your articles purporting to "disprove" evolution.

Yup, they do, and your point that they did was your inability to answer the following question:

So what parts can we have life without?
Post# 34.

The facts in those articles are all pretty essential to life. So yes, they could not have arisen piecemeal. As I have often stated there are quite a few essential life functions. They all have to be present for life to exist. They could not have arisen piecemeal.

You see the problem with evolutionists and why evolution is not science is that they think that the different functions of life are not related and thus you can build things up like a house of blocks. You cannot. You need numerous parts to have life be life.