Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JNB
Thanks for that. The question is what the lines for the '04 elections (assuming AG Salazar isn't able to halt their implementation) are. Is it more or less GOP ? Reagan won 63% in '84 and Bush, Sr. won 52% in '88 and it still managed to elect Campbell in '86 (who beat a Republican freshman elected in '84), so it's not entirely out of the question a 'Rat could win it. It's definitely going to set off a scramble. I wonder what McInnis's real reason for retiring was ?
10 posted on 09/07/2003 11:29:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

Ben Campbell in 86 ran as a pro gun, pro land rights conservative Democrat, that kind of Democrat really doesnt exist in the West anymore, and far fewer people split their tickets now compared to 18 years ago. The Seat under the old lines in 2000 gave Bush 53% and the 2002 lines gave Bush 54%. The GOP of course can not take this seat for granted, but at the same time, this will be a difficult seat for them to target none the less, especially considering problems the national party has had with fundrasing.
11 posted on 09/07/2003 11:41:57 PM PDT by JNB (I am a Catholic FIRST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson