Right dogbyte?
Oh, so you are one of those mentally challenged folks who believe that Saddam was behind 9/11. That explains a lot.
You must also think that since Jesse Jackson is a "christian" and Pat Robertson is a "christian", both from the american south, that they are natural allies.
You are what the screw ups at PNAC are counting on. There are many forms of evil in the world. No, they aren't all bestest buddies either. Osama is a fundamentalist. Hussein is a secularist butcher. Hussein would kill ya, let his kids rape ya, but at the same time put a "christian" Tariq Aziz in his cabinet, let the women go unveiled, sell booze, and let girls wear skirts. Obviously Osama dug him.
Can ya get more blissfully ignorant? Osama Bin Laden called Hussein a "Communist infidel". Yeah, they were tight. I am sure Saddam was cheering 9/11 on, but this was Osama's gig.
You can try to redirect why spending $220 billion on one butcher, who wasn't involved in 9/11 is justified to avenge 9/11 but a rational mind might have problems with that road.
Osama is sitting in his cave in the mountains saying, wow... they are spending $220 billion on Iraq, I am watching it on CNN, it is very painful to me. I have learned my lesson.
Ok sure, ya bet ya. So, we have no WMD's. David Kay met with Rummy this week, and Rummy said Kay has squat contrary to the rumours otherwise that have been spread. No biggie.
You remind me of a democrat who would say that Mengele was a bad German, therefore we need Universal Health Coverage. The logic is about equivalent. So, we pissed off the rest of the world except for England, 3 squads from Poland, a sherpa from Nepal, and a guy named Skip who are all members of the "Coalition of the willing".
Everything is super. Yes, we need to spend $220 billion in Iraq to punish 9/11. Ya got me won over. I propose next that we punish our kid who acted up 10 years ago, because our youngest child burned down the house.
No...I'm a realist.
I truly could give a rat's ass about Saddam Hussein, but I do appreciate the use of Iraq to stage the war. Let the rest of the terrorist-sponsoring, camel-dictators over there know that the US Army is ready to deply at a moment's notice to knock each and every one of them off if need be.
"a Bin Laden called Hussein a "Communist infidel"."
Ah! The mouthpiece for the left speaks! And in true friggin' apparatchik form!
Why don't you tell us what ELSE Usama said...right after calling Hussein an infidel?
Usama pledged to help the "infidel" against the Americans, didn't he doggy?
But you won't say that because you truly believe yourself smarter than your average bear...not so, you're just a dog lappin' at the left's left-overs platter.
Yes we do...we need to stage our troops near the battle.
A military genius you ain't doggy.
I bet you are one of those morons who believe that we should instead use those troops over there to defend our borders from terrorists.
Your idea of fighting the war against terrorists is to try stopping them at our front door.
Mine is to kill them in their own houses...over there.
It's too late if they are at our front door.
Good Lord...are you thick.
See, even you can see the benefits of staging our troops in the immediate area instead of here.
If the troops were here, Usama would be freely moving about and blowing us up like before.
I say that if we have to use bombs, and tanks, and missiles to destroy any and all terrorists that we do it THERE...not here, and while we're at it, we can destroy a few terrorist sympathetic governments along the way.
How much would you be willing to pay NOT to have a few more 9/11's and dozens of homicide bombers hitting US targets?
To stop all that, we have to do what Israel is doing...killing their leaders, and doing it where they live.
We don't know for a fact either way .. But there is evidence that they were at least talking.
Yes, I have read the stories they didn't like each other, but they both had something in common .. they both hated America and wanted to destroy us
This thread has been an interesting exercise in discovery for me.....
The one time that I 'used' my son to make a political point was right here on this thread against billbears.....for which I subsequently apologized and admitted was completely wrong......to him, AND to you.
Since that time, I have found out that billbears is an honest gentleman who respects both my son and me. We disagree in a major way, but we are both adults, and now have an improved relationship.
You, on the other hand, have revealed that you are anything BUT honest, and as far away from a gentleman that male human beings get (can I assume you ARE both male, and human?). You have continued to be abusive and dishonest, and reveal your own weakness in thought and character in every post (especially the deleted one).
Differences of opinions among adults do not result in the abusive posts that you level at everyone in your path, dogbyte.........operative word here.......ADULT.