Almost Two Years After They Were Defeated, Thousands Join The Talibans New Jihad

The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 9-7-2003 | Massoud Ansari

[winker]

Sombody email allah about these new pagan recruits. Looks like another shortage of virgins in the making!

[Mike Darancette]

They are known as the Sarbaz - those who care nothing for their own lives

As they have denounced their humanity then they should be given no quarter.

[Militiaman7]

They'll make good ferterlizer

[Brimack34]

What would Howard Dean say: It is our fault we made them mad. If we would have stayed home everything would be alright. Now elect me and we will be safe.

[Democratshavenobrains]

HEADLINE: Losers in war talk tough afterwards.

[GWMDB]

This is a continuation of religeous war. But Jesus is King and these sorry godless creatures will be crushed in the dirt.

[Jim Noble]

Almost two years after they were defeated

They were not defeated.

Their government was chased from power, and their fighters were dispersed.

Defeated means that they are broken and are amenable to our will.

That is not true in Afgahnistan, and it is not true in Iraq.

[tbpiper]

let them all come together

That would be a MOAB moment.

[Redleg Duke]

"I told them that my first and last commitment is jihad...

The 2003 Darwin Award Contender from Afganistan!

[God luvs America]

Alert, Alert, Alert!....Jihad #23,556,678,008,543,234!

[risk]

>>>> If this story is true, who's the enemy?

For the last year, my Hindu friends have been telling me that the State Department was mistaken in its attempts to whitewash Mushraff's innocence and Pakistan's guilt in fomenting the Taliban's rise to power. Iraq first, they said? Why Iraq now, when Saudi Arabia has financed and Pakistan has deployed an Islamic bomb already?

My stock and standard answer was "Give the president a chance. You haven't seen anything yet."

I'm still waiting. We had a hollow but necessary victory in Iraq, but our enemies are still gathering their forces. The Roadmap proved my Hindu friends were right. Abaas's resignation just makes the proof stronger.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

OMG! And this time they are going to be even MORE formidable than last time! What utter nonsense. The Left is going apoplectic and hysterical these days. LOL!

[blam]

"Why Iraq now, when Saudi Arabia has financed and Pakistan has deployed an Islamic bomb already?

Not many people know that.

The Saudi's passed the money through the BCCI bank which also gave money to Jimmy Carter ($13m), Jesse Jackson and Andrew Young.

The Saudi's also have Chinese ballistic missiles deployed now for decades.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Arguably correct. They will be defeated after enough of them have been killed and they stand down. The rise in power of the more sensible countrymen should hasten this, God willing.

[Destro]

correct. We cut off the tail but the lizard still wags the stump -and can grow it back in time.

[woofie]

We should help them with their Jihads ...we can help them get their virgins in an afterlife

[Luke Skyfreeper]

They are known as the Sarbaz - those who care nothing for their own lives

I don't give a flip for their lives, either.

[WOSG]

The Iraq victory was FAR FROM HOLLOW. ... The center of Arab civilization was for many centuries in Baghdad, and will once again be that way, this time as a Democracy that will forever change the face of Islam.

This is long, long term culture change, but the Iraq Liberation war just speeded up history by about 50 years. The terrorists know this and that is why they are blowing things up in baghdad; if it didnt matter they wouldnt be doing that.

Paki's complicity in the taliban is of historical interest but the key thing is that the taliban have used Pakistan madrasses as recruiting grounds and pakistan
Give the Prez credit on the fact that he is looking at the situation now and not historically, and using what he can of Pakistan's help. It's a balancing act, to not turn them agains tus and thereby turn Pakistan into a nuclear-armed safe haven for terrorists (bad bad bad scenario); we need Pakistan on our side even if it's full of taliban sympathizers, indeed, all the more more because of that.

Sooner or later though, the wahabbi Saudi's, the Iranians ayatollahs and the Paki taliban-lovers have to come to account: Free Lebanon, quit funding palestinian terrorism, quit funding wahabbism, rid kashmir and pakistan of terrorists and al quaeda, give up the bomb (for Pakistan and Iran), and put Iran, SA, and Pakistan on road to freedom, tolerance, and Democracy. A long fight.

[TBP]

The Hindus have their own agenda and it is strongly anti-American. They have refused to provide any cooperation in the War on Terror, while Pakistan has been helping us track down Al Qaeda members and leaders.

In fact, when Pakistan started doing this, India moved troops to the Kashmir border. Their plan worked. They forced Pakistan to divert troops to the border and away from the search for Al Qaeda, then they complained that Pakistan wasn't helping.

Hindustan has had a long history of anti-Americnism.

India votes against us at the UN more often than any country except Cuba. (That's right -- more than Red China!) It voted with the world's tyrannies to throw the United States off the Human Rights Commission.

Last year, India entered into a large oil deal with Iraq. They referred to Iraq as a "strategic partner." They have sold heavy water to Iran.

India was a longtime ally of the Soviet Union, with which it had a 100-year friendship treaty, and supported the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, yet opposed our actions there.

In 1999, according to The Indian Express, the Indian Defense Minister organized and led a meeting with the Ambassadors from Cuba, Red China, Iraq, Russia, Libya, and Serbia aimed at setting up a security alliance "to stop the U.S." He described America as "vulgarly arrogant."

India is not a country to be trusted.

[Militiaman7]

Also, Dean would say, we as Americans must understand the rage of the jihadist and to quote our former leader "We need to feel their pain".

IMHO, Dean is full of BS.