Skip to comments.
A Constitutional Anachronism: Immigrants should be eligible for the Presidency
nytimes.com ^
| September 6, 2003
| nytimes.com
Posted on 09/06/2003 2:53:44 PM PDT by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
God help us no!
As an immigrant from Europe I can tell you I am 100% loyal to the USA but I would not take up arms against the land of my birth. Ok, it is highly unlikely that the USA would go to war with my country and thus it is safe for me to say so but we have been at war against many lands and the concern of our founding fathers in dual loalties was well founded.
1
posted on
09/06/2003 2:53:45 PM PDT
by
Destro
To: Destro
This will go nowhere in a hurry.
2
posted on
09/06/2003 2:56:30 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
To: Destro
The Japanese government was far more racist than the Germans. They would have treated any captured Japanese American as a traitor. (My friends tell me they still do!)
That is why the Nisei were shipped off to the European theatre. On the other hand, Americans of German extraction (notably Eisenhower) were given the opportunity to fight Germans. The Nisei got more medals per man than any other regiment.
Dreyfus, the famous Captain of France was accused of treason, not because of evidence, but because of his Jewish-German(Alsacien) roots. Still, he served with distinction after all the hoopla in the First World War.
German Americans, and Japanese Americans appreciated the opportunities they were given. Perhaps you think that you have not been treated well enough here, compared to your "home country"?
3
posted on
09/06/2003 3:03:39 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy, or is it monotony?)
To: Destro
Napoleon and Hitler were both immigrants when they became leaders of their countries. I'll think I'll pass on this idea.
4
posted on
09/06/2003 3:03:52 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Destro
Orrin Hatch's birdbrain idea endorsed by the NY Times. How heartwarming.
Hatch is senile. The NYT is anti-American. Great combination.
To: Destro
Some historians are puzzled about what the Founding Fathers had in mind.Some historians are confused about the seemingly indecipherable hieroglyphs that appear between the First and the Third Ammendments. Many have postulated that it is just an ink smudge, while others speculate that is an unusual typographical error.
At issue here, however, is the fact that the Constitution creates, at least in regard to eligibility for the nation's highest office, a level of second-class citizenship wholly inconsistent with American values.
Because people who can't run for president are automatically relegated into a second class status?
Looks like I've been being oppressed and didn't even know it...
The president should not have a secondary national identity. This would lead to foreign entanglements and skew foreign and domestic policy. For example, do you think there might be some problems if we elected a president who identified with the Palestinians, or the French, or the Pakistanis?
To: Destro
Thank you for taking a stand on this. We need more immigrants like you to raise new generations of Americans who believe in the American dream -- and support our Constitution.
7
posted on
09/06/2003 3:19:01 PM PDT
by
risk
To: Destro
Only because it's from the NYT do I assume this isn't a joke.
Allow immigrants to run for President and 20 years from now you'll have:
- Vicente Fox's successor, with dual citizenship...
- Runs for the Presidency on the La Rasa ticket
- Thanks to drivers license and other immigrant appeasing legislation...
- Millions of illegal aliens vote in CA, TX, FL, AZ, NJ, IL, and NY, which by that time have the majority of the population.....
- Giving him enough electoral votes to win.
"Some (dumbass) historians puzzle about what the Founding Fathers had in mind." Oh, gee, I don't know, there were still millions of people who had been British loyalists in the country, and maybe, just maybe, the Founders were trying to make sure that some charismatic chap born in Britain wouldn't move here and try to run.
To: Destro
A few weeks ago Hatch was advocating the blowing up of computers of those who downloaded music. Now, Hatch is advocating the blowing up of the Constitution.
If Hatch's idea passed, how long before it would be altered again so that illegals could run for office (and vote, of course). Then, some other idiot in the near future would advocate that a presidential candidate didn't even have to be from the US; heck, anyone in the world could run for the US presidency.
Idiocy abounds and plenty of idiots feed it.
[Shaking head in disbelief and wonderment at who elected Hatch to the Senate.]
9
posted on
09/06/2003 3:25:51 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: fhayek
Napoleon and Hitler were both immigrants There's a long list and it goes back to the Ice Age. How about William the Conquerer? The primary thought now is that the mass migration of Mexicans will culminate in a Mexican president, which would put the candle on the cake.
10
posted on
09/06/2003 3:25:51 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Destro
Why don't we just turn over everything we have to immigrants. Then, we can all go to where they came from, come here illegaly, then we can get our country back.
11
posted on
09/06/2003 3:27:12 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: Destro
Obviously more communist drivel from the great Satan of leftist print media.
It would be instructive, however, to read the NYT archives and see just what the grey lady's views were during the immigrant crush of the late 19th and early 20th century. Somehow, I bet you'd find that they were very anxious to ensure that all new citizens from foriegn lands were thoroughly 'Americanized' and on the same cultural page as natural born citizens.
They lie, they twist, they endlessly distort. The recent revelations of their lies and corrupt internal policies do not betray an anomaly, they simply sacrificed a few of their number that were impolitic enough to be caught in their treachery.
To: browardchad
Other recent treasonous activities on the part of Orrin Hatch:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/977004/posts WASHINGTON--Speaking at a rally of young undocumented immigrants who are urging Congress to allow them to attend public colleges at in-state tuition prices, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said the country will "benefit enormously" by opening college classes to the children of people who entered the U.S. illegaly.
13
posted on
09/06/2003 3:33:49 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(Fight The Real Enemy...)
To: TomGuy
see above post
14
posted on
09/06/2003 3:34:24 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(Fight The Real Enemy...)
To: ambrose
This is absurd. Is this to say that at any given future time, there might not be one solitary, native-born American in this wide land of ours who is qualifed to become President and as a result we would then have to turn to an immigrant?
15
posted on
09/06/2003 3:38:22 PM PDT
by
Salvey
To: ambrose
Sounds like Hatch has the same disease that came over Goldwater in his dotage.
16
posted on
09/06/2003 3:40:14 PM PDT
by
Salvey
To: explodingspleen
You mean John Kerry?
17
posted on
09/06/2003 3:44:24 PM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(TOM McCLINTOCK is my choice for governor. He should be yours too.)
To: Destro
Some historians are puzzled about what the Founding Fathers had in mind. Well then "[s]ome historians" are a bunch of frickin morons.
I also suggest that they go here and do, at least the least amount of, research that any frickin person with two brain cells to rub together could do in order to determine what the "Founding Fathers had in mind".
To: A. Pole
"Some historians are puzzled about what the Founding Fathers had in mind."
Yeah, so are a lot of writers at the NYTimes. Not to mention a lot of liberals in Congress and a few Supremes who are bringing global laws into our courts.
Figure it out or leave it alone. But, you had better not try and change it.
No doubt the notion of illegals and border protection are equally puzzling to them.
To: Destro
20
posted on
09/06/2003 3:53:31 PM PDT
by
SwinneySwitch
(Freedom isn't Free - Support the Troops!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson