What think you, Conservatives? (Others need not apply)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Patangeles
Oh boy. This one will be a fun one. I can see it now.
Bump for later reading (after the bloodshed)
2 posted on
09/06/2003 11:17:58 AM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(Chad Fairbanks - 1970 Recipient of the Prestigious Y-Chromosome Award)
To: Patangeles
When is the Election?
Do we have to hurry?
4 posted on
09/06/2003 11:20:35 AM PDT by
deport
To: Patangeles
I will, unless he signs the new assault weapons bill. Then I might just sit it out.
5 posted on
09/06/2003 11:21:11 AM PDT by
MonroeDNA
(No longshoremen were injured to produce this tagline.)
To: Patangeles
Right, vote early and often.
7 posted on
09/06/2003 11:22:04 AM PDT by
mvonfr
To: Patangeles
Slow day at your house?
8 posted on
09/06/2003 11:24:35 AM PDT by
varon
To: Patangeles
I guess you haven't seen Zogby's new poll....it looks like no one is voting for Bush, he's toast(wink).
9 posted on
09/06/2003 11:25:45 AM PDT by
mystery-ak
(Happy Birthday, Mike...I'll blow your candles out for you this year.)
To: Patangeles
At this present point in time, I have no intention of voting for Bush, with these sole caveats: If Hillary enters the race, I will vote AGAINST her. If G.W. lets the Assault Weapon ban die, I will vote FOR him.
11 posted on
09/06/2003 11:28:01 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: Patangeles
Maybe if he starts channelling 1963 Barry Goldwater...
To: Patangeles
No, I don't think so. The GOP does more work for me in the minority. Sorry.
14 posted on
09/06/2003 11:28:39 AM PDT by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan, but I am a CHIEFS fan.)
To: Patangeles
He is stupid. I'll kick his butt!
Signed,
Ann Richards
16 posted on
09/06/2003 11:31:51 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Vote for Arnold. At least he has a shot.)
To: Patangeles
Thank you for reminding me! When do the polls close here anyway?
19 posted on
09/06/2003 11:34:45 AM PDT by
FourPeas
((Need I close my tag??))
To: Patangeles
We should make sure to vote fore Bush, becuse if we don't, a Democrat will win. If the repercussions are not obvious to you, please explain yourself!Great post!
Can you imagine if we didn't vote for President Bush. We would have millions of illegal aliens crashing our borders and defecating on our sovereignty, causing nationwide fraud and lawlessness. Thanks God for President Bush!
To: Patangeles
Hi, I'm looking for the live thread. Did Dan Rather say anything funny, yet?
|
28 posted on
09/06/2003 11:47:42 AM PDT by
Sabertooth
(Arnold wants Illegals to be legalized... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/971733/posts)
To: Patangeles
GWB is a terrific president, and is doing what any politician has to do to get elected.
32 posted on
09/06/2003 11:55:53 AM PDT by
tkathy
To: Patangeles
Living in Massachusetts, I have the luxury of voting for anyone I want without risking a Republican defeat nationally. Because no matter how (or whether) I vote in this benighted commonwealth, the Democratic candidate for President will always carry the state.
33 posted on
09/06/2003 11:57:29 AM PDT by
Maceman
To: Patangeles
We should make sure to vote fore Bush, becuse if we don't, a Democrat will winGeorge Bush is a Republican?
36 posted on
09/06/2003 12:03:11 PM PDT by
putupon
(Wake up and smell the RINOs.)
To: Patangeles
Bush isn't perfect, but a 666 Democrat is a hell of a lot worse.
39 posted on
09/06/2003 12:08:46 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Patangeles
Well..honestly I am torn.. for IMHO Bush is NO conservative.. I only WISH a true conservative would step to the plate. A friend long ago said that at least if there is a Demoncrat in office, the Republicans would FIGHT.. I am disappointed in Bush not for Iraq etc but for his domestic policies.
40 posted on
09/06/2003 12:12:13 PM PDT by
Zipporah
To: Patangeles
I'm in.
To: Patangeles
Media Employment Report Cover-up: 150,000 New Jobs Added August The press has been saturated since Friday morning with misleading reports claiming that the number of jobs held by Americans declined by nearly 100,000 in August. However, the actual jobs statistic used by the Labor Department to measure the unemployment rate showed just the opposite - with the economy adding almost 150,000 new jobs.
42 posted on
09/06/2003 12:13:33 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson