Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmstein7
The Texas Supreme Court has left the door open here, and the first person to file a brief that backs up the above propositions with good case law and arguments will have a good shot at success.

Since only three Justices noted that the dismissal was made without regard to constitutional issues, that sort of implies that the other six Justices don't agree.

4 posted on 09/06/2003 11:24:02 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
Not necessarily. Like denied cert, it may not mean anything.
5 posted on 09/06/2003 11:27:52 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
Since only three Justices noted that the dismissal was made without regard to constitutional issues, that sort of implies that the other six Justices don't agree.

Or that they did not hear it. When the time comes, if it does, they (the republicans) can request that a full panel hear the case (en banc).

10 posted on 09/06/2003 12:41:02 PM PDT by texgal (end no-fault divorce laws and return DUE PROCESS to our citizens))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson