To: WhiskeyPapa
It was intended for 'perpetual union' so expressed in the preambleUnfortunately Lee was referring to the Articles, not the Constitution.
99 posted on
09/09/2003 4:55:00 AM PDT by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
It was intended for 'perpetual union' so expressed in the preamble Unfortunately Lee was referring to the Articles, not the Constitution.
You know that's not true. Why on earth would the Articles matter in 1861? And Lee refers to the "safeguards" put in by the framers. Why would you tell a lie like that?
Walt
101 posted on
09/09/2003 5:02:12 AM PDT by
WhiskeyPapa
(Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
Unfortunately Lee was referring to the Articles, not the Constitution. Yes. We've had this conversation with your interlocutor before. Lee, at his secretary, simply got it wrong.
Next someone will be quoting the Preamble again to "prove" that the Constitution amalgamated the States.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson