Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
None of the framers suggested the states were sovereign.

I forgot to mention that, on March 2, 1861, a constitutional amendment was proposed that would have outlawed secession. Would Congress have proposed an amendment outlawing secession if they believed it to already be unlawful?

Also, after the war the majority Republican Party instructed the southern states, as a condition of being readmitted to the union, to rewrite their constitutions outlawing secession. It appears the Republican Party did not believe secession to be unconstitutional.

856 posted on 09/28/2003 7:05:46 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies ]


To: PhilipFreneau
I forgot to mention that, on March 2, 1861, a constitutional amendment was proposed that would have outlawed secession.

You need to mention that you made that up.

Walt

859 posted on 09/28/2003 8:51:27 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau
Also, after the war the majority Republican Party instructed the southern states, as a condition of being readmitted to the union, to rewrite their constitutions outlawing secession.

There has never been any legal question that no state can get out of the Union on its own resolve. The acts of the so-called seceded states were acts of revolution, and you cannot legislate revolution.

There is no need for additional statutes or documents to outlaw secession; the wording of the Constitution is adequate to do that.

Walt

861 posted on 09/28/2003 9:08:59 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson