Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
If the north simply "put up with" the south out of necessity, which implies that they would have been happier without it if they could, why did they fight tooth and nail to keep it the second the possibility of ridding themselves of it became a reality?

To prove that representative government could work, of course.

Walt

689 posted on 09/20/2003 3:35:43 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
To prove that representative government could work, of course.

...which they did not do. Instead, one section of the country denied the right of self government to the other by way of force thereby destroying its existence in both.

690 posted on 09/20/2003 8:07:31 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
"To prove that representative government could work, of course."

I look in on this forum now and then to see if anything has changed, and one thing that seems to be eternally unchangable is you. You are forever posting the same nonsense.

697 posted on 09/20/2003 3:58:14 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson