Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
See #627.

627 refers to Fort Sumter. We are discussing Moultrie, Johnson, and Pinckney.

You said "forts in Charleston." If you didn't mean to include Sumter you should have said so.

You tried to deceive people and you got caught.

Walt

669 posted on 09/18/2003 1:08:53 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
You said "forts in Charleston."

Yeah, in a post that repeatedly and specifically stated its reference to be Moultrie, Johnson, and Pinckney - as in the forts that were seized after Anderson moved into Sumter. It was your sidekick's argument at the time that SC had "stolen" those forts before it sent negotiators to Washington to deal with Sumter, which was another issue entirely. I simply pointed out the fact that they did not steal those forts, which had been theirs to begin with and which had been ceded only conditionally. As is your chronic habit, you came along and attempted to assign Sumter into my post and preceeded to debate an issue that I do not dispute. But since you are more interested in semantical nonsense than you are in facts this should come as no surprise.

670 posted on 09/18/2003 5:43:09 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
You tried to deceive people and you got caught.

Sounds like the Devil is attempting to point a finger at a sinner to me.

673 posted on 09/18/2003 5:45:00 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson