Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
You know that's not true. Why on earth would the Articles matter in 1861? And Lee refers to the "safeguards" put in by the framers. Why would you tell a lie like that?

Because it's the truth!

It's not the truth. Lee refers to the Constitution by name in the letter.

Walt

137 posted on 09/09/2003 10:51:56 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
It's not the truth. Lee refers to the Constitution by name in the letter.

So. Here's the text again,

'The framers of our Constitution never exhausted so much labor, wisdom and forebearance in its formation, and surrounded it with so many guards and securities, if it was to be broken by every member of the Confederacy at will. It was intended for "perpetual union" so expressed in the preamble, [contained in the Preamble of the Articles, not the Constitution] and for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution, or the consent of all the people in convention assembled [contained in Article XIII of the Articles, not the Constitution]. It is idle to talk of secession [from the Articles, which prohibited it, not from the Constitution, which reserve the power to the states].'

145 posted on 09/09/2003 12:02:52 PM PDT by 4CJ (Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson