N. Korea: Exercise Aimed at Intercepting the North`s WMD Takes Place on Sep. 13 and 14

The first joint maritime exercise which aims to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction will be staged on September 13 and 14 in the Coral Sea off Australia`s northeast coast.

The United States and 10 nations that participate in the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) that U.S. President George W. Bush initiated reached an agreement on the exercise after two days of their third round of talks Wednesday and Thursday in Paris, France.

The exercise, however, will get on the nerves of North Korea, which earlier attacked the PSI. North Korea warned last month just before the 6 way talks held in Beijing that PSI is a strategy to isolate its regime and it would step up its nuclear efforts if the U.S. did not drop the exercise.

Next week`s exercise, in which the United States, Australia, Japan and France will participate, is dubbed the "Pacific Protector." The participating countries will carry out an intensive exercise aimed at intercepting ships suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction.

The 11 nations` representatives of the talks agreed to conduct an amphibious exercise 10 times altogether until next year. The "Pacific Protector" exercise will be the first of the 10 planned.

The representatives of the talks promised in the closing statement Thursday that they would strengthen cooperation between member countries, activate swift intelligence exchange and, if necessary, amend domestic and international laws to beef up efforts to intercept the transportation of WMD or related materials.

The talks in Paris, following the talks in Madrid, Spain and in Brisbane, Australia, in June and July, set the guidelines for political, legal and technical ways of cooperation in an effort to prevent proliferation and transfer of WMD and the guidelines will be notified to non-member countries of PSI as well, sources said.

John Bolton, Washington`s top arms control official, the most influential figure of the talks, said after the talks that "PSI does not target any particular country, but we have the greatest concerns over North Korea’s nuclear programs."

The first tangible success of PSI cooperation was Taiwan authorities’ interception of a North Korean ship that appeared to have been carrying materials for making chemical weapons.

"The U.S., in particular, hopes China and Russia to participate in the PSI," Bolton added. China, however, is opposed to PSI, saying, "The best way to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is through dialogue." The member nations in PSI are the United States, Japan, France, Britain, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Spain. The next talks of PSI will be held in London, Britain.

Get a load of this, they may never be free!
U.S. Must Keep Eye on China Military Build-Up

Tuesday , September 09, 2003
By Melana Zyla Vickers

With all the difficulties facing U.S. forces in Iraq, it’s easy to forget that the challenges there are modest compared to those a big military power could throw in the American direction.

Yet a little-noticed recent report by the secretary of defense to Congress serves as an alarming reminder that China (search) isn’t wasting any time building up militarily while the U.S. is otherwise occupied, and that the north Pacific power could present a formidable military challenge if in the future it became an outright foe.

Even as the Bush administration asks Congress for billions more in Iraq funds, it needs to keep focused on big-ticket, long-term investments that will prepare the military for a future, major military threat -- whether it be China or another power.

Among the areas of advancement for China, whose annual spending on defense is estimated at $45-$65 billion, and rising by 17 per cent annually:

New means of projecting power beyond its borders: China has some 450 short-range ballistic missiles already deployed. It is expected to add about 75 missiles per year over the next few years, the report to Congress says. All China’s missiles are believed to be targeted at Taiwan. (search) In addition, China is replacing all 20 of its intercontinental ballistic missiles -- capable of reaching the U.S. -- with longer range versions. China is also working on a submarine-launched ballistic missile, the Pentagon report says.

Anti-access, or the ability to prevent U.S. vessels’ access to certain areas, or prevent aircraft access to airspace: China’s first two Sovremennyy class guided missile destroyers (search) from Russia have been integrated into the naval fleet, the report says. It also says that China is buying two more from Russia.

China has built a diesel electric sub and has bought four Kilo-class diesel subs (search) from Russia, with orders for eight more. China has produced a new nuclear-powered attack sub class called the Type 093 SSN (search), according to the report. In addition, China has plans over the next 10 years to acquire from Russia -- or develop with Russian help -- double-digit surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) (search) for a highly advanced SAM air defense system.

Counter-space measures against satellites, other targets: China may have high-energy laser equipment that could be used to develop ground-based anti-satellite weapons, the report says.

Information warfare: Chinese info warriors stress computer and network warfare (search) and electronic security systems, among other things. The report says they have an “unusual emphasis on a host of new information warfare forces instead of the “information superiority” and other approaches used in the U.S.

In addition, information-warfare (search) reserve units in several Chinese cities are developing “pockets of excellence” that could eventually expand to form a corps of “network warriors” to defend China’s information and telecoms networks while uncovering weaknesses in those of other countries, the report says.

The Pentagon needs to continue investing -- and in some cases begin investing -- in capabilities that will give the U.S. the upper hand, and that will allow the U.S. to target enemy systems that cam be moved around and hidden, that are kept deep inland and out of current U.S. reach, and those that target space. Among the investments the U.S. needs most:

A long-range, stealthy bomber: Currently, the U.S. has only 16 long-range stealthy B-2 bombers. The House Armed Services Committee has shown strong interest in supporting a new bomber program. Ideally, the fighter-obsessed Pentagon will quit dragging its feet and support a new long-range, stealthy bomber A.S.A.P. Only such an aircraft could penetrate enemy airspace, reach its target deep inland from a long distance away, and deliver the kind of payload that would be necessary.

A long-range, stealthy reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV): The U.S. has long range UAVs but not stealthy ones. Only a UAV with long range and stealth could operate in an environment where there are double-digit SAMS and which it had to fly to from a base far away, such as Guam, to a target deep inland.

More converted Trident subs: The cruise missiles (search) fired from converted, stealthy Trident submarines would be highly effective at hitting enemy targets without the enemy knowing whence the strike came. Even more effective would be faster, ballistic missiles fired at the targets. The idea of equipping the Tridents with those missiles should be explored, and a few more Tridents (search) should be converted to this missile application also.

Stealthy, long-range transport for special forces: If commandos need to operate behind enemy lines in a future, that enemy being China, only an aircraft that can fly from a base out of Chinese missile range and that can avoid Chinese air defenses will succeed in depositing the soldiers in country. The special forces don’t have such aircraft, and the Pentagon needs to invest in some.

Space defenses: These might include the means of taking out enemy ground-based lasers and of finding and disabling enemy micro-satellites. The U.S. has no such capabilities right now.

All that’s a tall order. But it’s essential that even as Iraq pulls at the Pentagon’s resources, it stay focused on the long-term competition -- because that’s what Beijing is doing.

Melana Zyla Vickers, a columnist for TechCentralStation.com, is also a senior fellow at the Independent Women's Forum. She is a former editorial-board member of USA Today, Canada's The Globe and Mail and The Asian Wall Street Journal, and a former editor at the Far Eastern Economc Review. She has a master's degree in strategic studies and economics from Johns Hopkins University's Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.