Nobel Prize Design in DNA II

DesignedUniverse ^ | September 4, 2003 | Myself

[gore3000]

Part 1 is at Part I

[gore3000]

Some more scientifice evidence for life being designed.

[4mycountry]

[Helms]

An American and an Englishman. What no Arab!
As I understand it, the Israelis are deep into this type of stuff too.

[gore3000]

Nice Gif!

[4mycountry]

http://gifs.net/animate/giflist.htm

[NewLand]

Pre-evo invasion ***PING***

[gore3000]

Pre-evo invasion ***PING***

Naaah, the evos know that they cannot dispute the above because they know that evolution is not science. Like with the previous thread, they will stay away.

[jammer]

Huh? There isn't a piece of information in the article that educated people on both sides of the issue don't know. Perhaps your side is correct. Perhaps theirs is. Or both. Or neither. But this article is no evidence either way.

[Tribune7]

good post

[gore3000]

There isn't a piece of information in the article that educated people on both sides of the issue don't know.

Perhaps, perhaps not. Seems to me that if people did indeed know all the above, (and that on the previous thread), they would know that evolution is a bad joke.

[NewLand]

"the evos know that they cannot dispute the above because they know that evolution is not science"

Here is a scientific demonstration of evolution right before your very eyes...

[gore3000]

good post

Thanks. Evolutionists constantly claim that all science is about evolution and that it confirms evolution. In the primary field for evolution to be science - biology and genetics, one cannot find any worthwhile discovery confirming evolution.

This article grew out of a challenge I had made a few times to the evolutionists where I told them that not a single Nobel Prize winning discovery in the field of biology was supportive of evolution. That they flee from these threads shows quite well, that my statement is correct.

[Hyacinth Bucket]

Hi NL,
Thanks for the ping. DNA Sequencing is actually what I do for a living.

It is very interesting that the Human Genome Project which was supposed to demystify and hasten the understanding of the human body actually showed that we are much more complicated than was previously thought. I worked on this project at the low level but I couldn't help but laugh at perhaps God's sense of humor when the smug scientists tried to put a proud face on upon presentation of the findings. They were so sure that this would finally unravel the complexities and mysteries of life and perhaps invalidate God (this is only my interpretation of course because they would never say this).
HB

[jammer]

Well, I have severe doubts about the theory, on scientific grounds. Before that, however, I had reconciled it with my Christianity, so scientific grounds has to be the basis of agreement or disagreement (with me, I emphasize; I know many other Christians who strongly disagree with me).

Anyway, it seems to me that, if anything, the article supports the possibility of evolution, with the possibility of tRNA screwing up codon assignments, etc. But, no one can give evidence--or realistic theory--of positive mutations there, so . . . I remain thankful for your posting the review of biochem, but also remain skeptical that it supports either side.

[Phaedrus]

Bumping for a later read ...

[jammer]

Okay, I'm basically a skeptic of evolution, but aren't you imputing motives to many--perhaps all, perhaps not--"scientists" that may not be fair? Perhaps there is justifiable pride in the accomplishment. Perhaps many, if not all, were not looking to support some other hidden agenda--perhaps they are truly motivated by scientific curiosity.

[gore3000]

I worked on this project at the low level but I couldn't help but laugh at perhaps God's sense of humor when the smug scientists tried to put a proud face on upon presentation of the findings. They were so sure that this would finally unravel the complexities and mysteries of life and perhaps invalidate God (this is only my interpretation of course because they would never say this).

This is what I keep seeing in all science - that just at the point when science thinks it is getting to the point where it will understand everything, poof, it finds out that it knows even less than it new before. The genome project is a good example. They had been studying genes for 50 years and thought they knew everything. Then all of a sudden they found out that 95% of what makes a human being they had not even looked at.

[NewLand]

Hi HB,

"I couldn't help but laugh at perhaps God's sense of humor when the smug scientists tried to put a proud face on upon presentation of the findings."

A perfect insight into God's character and [many] evo-psuedo-scientists lack of such...

Over in the Smokey Backroom they are saying this article is NOT science...thought you might be interested to hear that from the 'real' scientists... :-)

[NewLand]

"But, no one can give evidence--or realistic theory--of positive mutations there, so . . ."

WAIT! New evidence just coming in now...

...for a landing!