Oh, yeah, it's the Clinton approach to running a business, writ large. This past spring the execs had a "brainstorming" session in Napa Valley. The only things that came out if it were hangovers and a failed reorganization strategy. Right after that, the company pres accepted a $3M retention bonus in the same quarter the company lost $50M. But according to some of the apologists in this thread, it's business that's infallible, y'know. Just shut up and move along. Your job was going the way of the dodo anyway and the gross mismanagement had nothing at all to do with it.
Why do the stockholders put up with this? I'm not being rhetorical, I'd really like to know how this passes as good management.