Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonF
"That would preserve the concept of Federalism, which the other amendment doesn't."

The only problem is that a lot of us want gay marriage totally banned across the United States. I don't think that your proposed Amendment would do that.
13 posted on 09/05/2003 10:35:11 AM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: No Dems 2004
The only problem is that a lot of us want gay marriage totally banned across the United States. I don't think that your proposed Amendment would do that.

No, it would not. But for the Federal government to step in and tell the states what they can and cannot define as marriage is a violation of Federalism. Someone can be conservative without being a fundamental Christian/Jew/Moslem. There have been a number of conservatives who are finding a conflict in telling the states what they can define as "marriage", as well as in the concept that one state can tell another state what a marriage is. This fixes that.

19 posted on 09/05/2003 12:22:05 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson