Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Ping - more commerce clause "substantial effects on interstate commerce" abuse...
62 posted on 09/05/2003 7:02:54 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ellery
"more commerce clause "substantial effects on interstate commerce" abuse..."

IMO, this is a direct violation of the second amendment.

No different than if congress attempted to limit speech by using the commerce clause to ban ink. You may call it an abuse of the commerce clause, but that would be abridging the freedom of speech.

OTOH, drugs have no such amendment protections.

65 posted on 09/05/2003 8:15:40 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson